My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 12-28-1994
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1994
>
CCP 12-28-1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:10:11 PM
Creation date
11/6/2006 3:44:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
128
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> . <br /> TOTAL: $39.07 <br /> . <br /> In the December 7 Memo, on Exhibit I, which is attached for <br /> reference, we assume that the estimated market value, which would <br /> be used for the generation of property taxes, would be 80% of the <br /> total project costs. 80% of $39.07 is $31.26, which is the <br /> number used in that Exhibit I and generates $1.90 per square foot <br /> in real estate taxes. $31.26 times 95,000 square feet, the <br /> building square footage, provides the estimated market value of <br /> $2,969,467 as used in that Exhibit I (there will be some small <br /> differences in the numbers due to the effect of rounding). <br /> Exhibit II uses the assumptions contained in Exhibit I of this <br /> memo and Exhibit I of the December 7 Memo. The total project <br /> costs are shown at $3,711,834 (80% of that number being <br /> $2,969,467 which is the estimated market value shown in Exhibit I <br /> of the December 7 Memo). The construction and other costs are <br /> $3,2~2,509 which corresponds to the total of direct and indirect <br /> . costs of $3,232,520 contained on Exhibit I of this memo. The <br /> Site Costs are shown at $1.60 per square foot which, as indicated <br /> above, is derived from Exhibit VII of the December 7 Memo. <br /> The building square feet and land square feet in Exhibit II are <br /> the numbers previously mentioned for Phase I and the average <br /> lease revenue per square foot is based on the mixed usage also <br /> previously described. The revenue inflation, vacancy and <br /> operating expenses are either industry standards or educated <br /> assumptions. The mortgage constant is the most difficult <br /> calculation. Interest rates are obviously rising, and the most <br /> likely scenario is probably a mixture of rates for construction <br /> and take-aut financing or a variable rate based on a <br /> predetermined index. It is necessary to establish the mortgage <br /> constant since it ultimately determines the amount of equity that <br /> is needed for the Project. Using the assumptions on Exhibit II <br /> . 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.