My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-09-07-Meeting Monday
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
04-09-07 - Meeting Monday
>
04-09-07-Meeting Monday
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2024 3:35:47 PM
Creation date
5/24/2024 3:35:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
. Memo to Michelle Wolfe 3 <br /> February 13th <br /> City hall arbitration <br /> Based on current estimates, the City can expect to spend at a minimum $385,000 to $555,000 for <br /> repairs. These repairs are needed regardless of the mediation/arbitration proceedings. At this <br /> cost, the City would be settling for minimum repairs with possibly aesthetic and durability <br /> concerns. We would not get two layers of building paper or galvanized angles as originally <br /> specified. Our goal is a building that does not leak upon normal rainfall. Also the building repairs <br /> will be spotty in nature and may lead to color variations in the stone (between old and new).As <br /> stated previously, the City can expect to spend around $20,000 in the next mediation. In the last <br /> mediation, the City was asked "off the record" if they would consider around $400,000 to settle. <br /> But that offer also pre-supposed a payment to Rochon of approximately $95,000 for a net of <br /> $305,000. <br /> To date the City has spent $123,300.00 on legal and arbitration fees. The City can expect to pay <br /> $120,000 to $160,000 for additional legal fees if it goes through the arbitration proceedings. <br /> It is very hard to speculate on what the City may be awarded if it goes through arbitration. <br /> Our legal counsel feels that whatever we may be awarded will most likely be shared between the <br /> Architect, Architectural Alliance, and the general contractor, Rochon. The ratio may be between <br /> 60/40 to 75/25, with the general contractor being the first ratio. Our attorney believes that legal <br /> fees spent in the past will not be considered in the settlement. <br /> Breaking down the City's most current statement of claims dated 2/13/07. (See attached) <br /> 1) Insurance costs are related to Five Sons Landscaping. They have since gone out of business <br /> and did not have adequate insurance coverage. <br /> 2) Landscaping. Again, that company has gone out of business, did not have adequate insurance <br /> coverage, and very tough to recover any costs. <br /> 3) The mechanical contractor has indicated that they would be willing to settle for a majority of <br /> the $29,000, maybe around $21,000. <br /> 4) The miscellaneous costs will be difficult to recover and costly to argue each individual point. <br /> 5) In terms of professional fees, $42,530.00 is for a bill that the City received from Architectural <br /> Alliance. Any amount we recover would most likely go to Architectural Alliance. In addition, <br /> while our attorney will try to argue that the legal fees should be included, he admits it generally <br /> is not. <br /> 6) The $22,593.00 in repairs already completed will most likely not be reimbursed fully. <br /> • \\RVNAS 1\AHdata$\Building\City Hall\Arden Hills-3-12-07-CouncilMemo.DOC <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.