My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-09-07-Meeting Monday
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
04-09-07 - Meeting Monday
>
04-09-07-Meeting Monday
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2024 3:35:47 PM
Creation date
5/24/2024 3:35:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Memo to Michelle Wolfe 4 <br /> February 13th <br /> City hall arbitration <br /> 7) In a likely scenario for arbitration, the City will most likely not be awarded costs for a <br /> complete tear off and repair of$1,813,413.00. Any amount that we receive will most likely be <br /> divided between the Architect and Contractor. <br /> 8) There is a good chance for some of the costs for special inspections and investigation to be <br /> recovered, but probably not in full, and also likely shared between Contractor and Architect. <br /> Without considering# 7, (the City's claim of$1,813,415.00 for entire replacement of the exterior <br /> stone), the City has a poor chance of recovering almost $240,000, of the remaining $380,717 in <br /> items 1 — 8. This leaves $140,717, minus the $69,296 already owed Rochon from the original <br /> contract. Leaving the City $71,421, plus what ever the City is awarded for the actual repairs left <br /> to do. <br /> The City has included a complete tear off of the exterior of the building at a cost of <br /> $1,813,415.00. Rochon has provided estimates for repair work ranging from $655,453 to <br /> $358,496. Our legal counsel feels that an arbitration award of around one million would be a <br /> very best case scenario, with an award around $800,000 more likely as our top figure. Again, that <br /> • amount most likely will be divided between the Architect and Contractor. If that division were <br /> 75/25, the City would receive $600,000, and still facing an uphill court battle to get the <br /> remainder ($200,000) from Architectural Alliance. That division may also be 60/40 with <br /> $480,000 going to the City and the remainder to acquire from the Architect. <br /> Summary <br /> Staff believes that an award for total replacement cost to be highly unlikely. An award for repair <br /> of the buildins known to be defective is y. The City has received quotes from our contractors <br /> from $988,800 to $571,782. Rochon has provided quotes from $655,453 to $358,496. <br /> Based upon these estimates, a top figure award around $600,000 seems most likely. With a 75/25 <br /> split, the City would receive $450,000, and an uphill court battle with the Architect for the <br /> remainder of the $150,000. Add to that figure the $71,421 (best estimate for the remainder of the <br /> statement of claims)brings a total of$521,421 the City would receive. <br /> If the City were to go thru arbitration, it can expect to spend approximately $140,000 with no <br /> guarantee on award amounts. <br /> Based upon the figures above, realizing that no award amounts are guaranteed, it seems <br /> reasonable for the City to look at a mediation figure of somewhere around$400,000 net. <br /> • Council Action Requested <br /> \\RVNAS1\AHdata$\Building\City Ha11\Arden Hills-3-12-07-CouncilMemo.DOC <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.