Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> I <br /> T-'" ":"'" - i_ '~'" <br /> ., , <br /> lJ' J \.... ~ " .. <br /> 0 ~ <br />{\,RDE~ HILLS CITY COUNq):, - FEBRUARY 27 1995 8 <br /> I <br />MOTION: Keim moved and Hicks seconded a motion to approve the Consent Calendar as <br /> presented, and authorize execution of all necessary documents contained therein, I <br /> The motion carried unanimously (4-0). <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS I <br />Acting Mayor Malone invited the audience to. address Council with any matters of concern I <br />during this portion of the meeting. No one stepped forward at this time. <br />UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS I <br />PLANNING CASE 95-2: CHESTNUT LOT SPLIT IV ARIANCE <br />City Administrator Fritsinger briefly reviewed the planning case. He indicated the applicant I <br />originally requested a 75 foot lakeshore setback variance and lot split to develop tWO lots on <br />Lexington A venue. I <br />Mr. F ritsinger indicated the Commission originally tabled this request to confirm the .. <br />approximate location of the building pads, He noted after reviewing revised plans showing the <br />building pads the Commission approved a lot split at 4365 Lexington A venue and a 75 foot OHW <br />lakeshore setback variance for both lot A and B at 4365 Lexington Avenue for primary buildings <br />and including any additions or extensions such as decks or porches. I <br />Mr. Fritsinger indicated the stated condition of a shared driveway should be included in the I <br />motion. <br />MOTION: Hicks moved and Keirn seconded a motion to approve Planning Case 95-2, <br />- Chestnut Lot Split/Variance for primary buildings and including any additions or I <br /> extensions such as decks, or porches. And a shared driveway be established <br /> between the two lots, The motion passed unanimously. (4-0), I <br />PLANNING CASE 95-5. OGREN CONCEPT PUD <br />City Administrator indicated this information is for informal discussion. I <br />Mr. Fritsinger indicated the applicant requested a concept review of a PUD for the Northwest I <br />corner of Old Highway 10 and County Road E-2. This concept was for the development of an <br />18 unit townhome subdivision, <br />Mr. Fritsinger indicated the setbacks proposed meet all requirements and the proposed units I <br />actually preserve more trees and natural beauty than a single family development would, -- <br /> I <br />