CCP 03-13-1995 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

I r::) /':r :.:,=V' .;; '.~ -:"~,.! " ,.. ...... ~.. AE,Dt;N HILLS CITY COUNCIl. - FJ;:BIWARY 27.1995 9 I Mr. Fritsinger indicated that there is no need for a variance for a private street as previously I thought. He noted the cul-de-sac has been redefined as a tear drop shape. Mr. Fritsinger indicated many of the drainage issues have been addressed, but a number are still I being reviewed. The applicant has relocated the detached garage and will use it as a utility garage. Mr. Fritsinger indicated landscaping has been redefined with 70 trees to be planted. I Mr. Fritsinger noted there should be an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan, although this proposal does meet the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. The amendment is for I clarification purposes and is not required for the project to be approved. Mr. Fritsinger indicated receiving letters from neighbors in opposition to the project, most concur . to leave as an open space. I Councilmember Hicks indicated he did not disagree with the project per say, but believes the increase in traffic to County Road E would force him to vote against the development, The closing of the north bound exit on Snelling Avenue by the County, causes traffic issues. ,. Councilmember Aplikowski indicated she is trying to keep an open mind regarding the development and she lives near the area, I Councilmember Keim inquired if there were common areas or just green space, Mr. Dan Ogren, the applicant indicated it would be green space, no playgrounds or such. I Acting Mayor Malone inquired if action was needed. Mr. Fritsinger indicated no, but any comments would be welcome, this would be before the Planning Commission on March 1, 1995. I - PLANNING CASE 95-7. MCGUIRE V ARIANCE I City Administrator Fritsinger indicated the applicant requested variances to the front yard and lakeshore setback requirements, A variance to Section IX, nonconforming uses was also I requested. Mr. Fritsinger noted the unusual circumstances surrounding this request, the applicant's home I had been damaged in a fire and they wish now to demolish and rebuild. The City building' official estimated that the value of the damage did not exceed 50% of the fair market value, but the applicant indicates it will cost the same to repair as compared to rebuild. I Mr, Fritsinger indicated the home was built in 1954 and the garage in 1968. He state a Lakeshore -- Setback Variance was approved as part of Planning Case #80-17 for the construction of a deck. I