CCP 03-16-1995 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

I , I. D. Environmental I I. The DNR has tabled its review of the proposal until Rice Creek Watershed District has completed its review. 2. Rice Creek Watershed District has not taken final action due to questions about I the location of other potential wetlands on the site. 3. The neighborhood has petitioned the State Environmental Quality Board for an I Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EA W). 4. The EQB has determined that the City is the appropriate governmental unit to decide the need for an EA W. I 5. The City has thirty working days to make a determination on the need for an EA Wand cannot approve the project until the need for an EA W has been determined. I 6. Staff has not yet reviewed the full EA W process. 2. Case #95-12. Comprehensive Plan Amendment I 1. The Land Use Plan Map designates the parcels as Park and Open Space. 2. The Park and Open Space Plan map does not designate the easterly parcel as existing Park and Open Space nor does it identify the parcel as proposed I Park and Open Space. The westerly parcel is shown as existing Park Space. .e 3. The Parks Commission has not indicated an interest in acquring this property. 4. Ramsey County Parks has not indicated an interest in acquiring this property. 5. Attorney Filla has provided a legal opinion stating when a conflict exists the I zoning regulations control development, not the Comprehensive Plan. 6. The Comprehensive Plan does not have to be amended for the Ogren PUD Proposal to proceed. I . I I I I Ie .