Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> . . <br /> .. approximately six feet wide and that people feel safe walking along that road, even though it has <br /> . a higher speed limit. When it was understood that the road bed, as designed and laid out in the <br /> plan, would essentially fit within the area now covered by the current road bed and shoulders, <br /> there was no issue about the width. <br /> . There was some discussion about the possibility of making the cross section of the road <br /> . asymmetrical by having a shoulder that was only four feet wide on one side, while widening the <br /> other side to eight feet. If this possible, it would be viewed favorably by the residents. <br /> . It should be noted that the expectation is for the new centerline to be north of the current <br /> centerline. This is because the current shoulder area on the north side is much wider than on the <br /> south side of the road. It is assumed that the construction of the road bed will use the existing <br /> . road bed and shoulder area, instead of encroaching on grass, shrubs, and yards. <br /> . 3. Parking <br /> It was noted that the plan for the road recommends that there be no parking on either side of the <br /> . road. Although parking is currently allowed along both sides of the road, there was no major <br /> opposition to the proposed parking ban. It was felt that the parking ban would add to the overall <br /> .. safety of the road by keeping cars from blocking the shoulders of the road, which would now be <br /> used as the walkways. <br /> . 4. No Passing <br /> . Some residents expressed the desire to see the entire length of County Road F. West, from the <br /> bridge over the interstate highway to the junclion with Old Snelling striped for no passing in <br /> either direction. This is the current striping on \he road, although the markings are old, worn, and <br /> I confusing due to even older markings that were left when the latest stripes were laid down. Lack <br /> of adequate repair over the years adds to the confusion of the markings. <br /> I 5. Safety <br /> I A primary concern of the citizens is for the safety of anyone using County Road F. West for <br /> driving or walking. It was suggested that the speed limil be lowered to 30 miles per hour. <br /> . Pedestrian Crossing areas and signs at the intersections with Fairview and Crystal may also let <br /> drivers know that they need to slow down and drive more carefully. There was discussion of a <br /> stop sign at the intersection with Fairview, although there was a feeling among many residents <br /> . that a stop sign would not be effective during the busiest traffic periods, which is when it would <br /> be wanted the most. <br /> .- <br /> 4 April 1995 - 2- County Road F. West <br /> . <br />