My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-13-24-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2024
>
05-13-24-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/3/2024 12:04:50 PM
Creation date
6/3/2024 12:04:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—MAY 13 2024 8 <br /> Councilmember Holden stated this occurred on Katie Lane and one of the options that was <br /> provided to the homeowner was the option to combine the two lots into one. However, she <br /> understood this particular lot was buildable. <br /> Mayor Grant indicated the assessment policy in 1997 would have been per linear foot and in <br /> 2004 the current assessment policy was approved, which was per lot. He stated this meant the <br /> Council had to determine if this property was one lot or two. <br /> Councilmember Holden asked if the property owner could be charged an assessment if they <br /> chose to subdivide the lot within a set period of time. <br /> Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen explained in 2009 the City approved a <br /> deferred assessment for one lot for 30 years or if triggered by a subdivision. <br /> Councilmember Monson explained she was confused as to why this property would be charged <br /> two assessments when it was one parcel. She questioned if the assessment could be triggered by <br /> the sale of the lot. She asked to clarify why is the lot being charged two assessments when it is <br /> one parcel <br /> Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen confirmed it could be triggered by the sale <br /> of the parcel and stated the policy considered how the property is platted and the second lot was <br /> platted as a buildable lot <br /> Councilmember Rousseau indicated there was a property on Keithson Avenue that has the same <br /> issue,but they have not requested an appeal. <br /> Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen agreed this was the case, noting the property <br /> on Keithson Avenue would be assessed for both lots because they did not make an appeal. <br /> Councilmember Rousseau questioned if a 50% break should be provided to the property on <br /> Keithson Avenue. <br /> Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen stated he would have to speak with the City <br /> Attorney, but he believed because the City did not receive an appeal, the assessment would move <br /> forward. <br /> Councilmember Holden reported residents were given an ample amount of time to call or write <br /> to the City and make an appeal. <br /> Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen indicated this was the case, stating the 429 <br /> process was very strict. <br /> Mayor Grant stated he did not have a problem with a deferred assessment for the property at <br /> 1370 Colleen Avenue. He reported if the landowner were to subdivide the property in 10 years, <br /> then they would be charged an assessment, but if it remains one lot, no additional assessment <br /> would be charged. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.