CCP 07-31-1995 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

I ORA ~T .. ~'. ;..r" Planning: Minutes Pag:e 7 7/05/95 . .. Chair Erickson hearing no further public comment closed the Public Hearing at 8:36 p.m. ,.'"' . Nelson inquired if all the lots meet the City requi!ements in the original concept plan. Mr. Ringwald indicated Lot 1 would still not meet $.\Ie setback requirement of 30 feet, unless a lot line could be . redrawn to show a jog, so a point of reference could be made to the north. Nelson inquired if the street meets City requirements. Mr. Ringwald indicated in the proposed plan, . the street or cul-de-sac, does not meet the requirements. He applauds the applicant for trying to save trees, the island in the cul-de-sac leaves the Public Works Department with concerns regarding maintenance and emergency vehicle access. . Carlson inquired as to how many trees will be saved. Mr. Krier indicated six mature oak trees. . Carlson inquired as to the cost for an ejector pump. Mr. Krier indicated he was unsure, but it does make the property hard to sell, because of the ongoing cost. . Larson indicated during the presentation Mr. Krier mentioned the original plan and the proposed plan; Larson inquired if perhaps there were more options than just those two, maybe using fill. .- Mr. Krier indicated using more fill would push the units further back, more trees would be lost, and the wetlands are also a consideration. . Larson inquired if only four lots were proposed would this give more opportunity for building within the requirements. Mr. Krier indicated that if the house pad on Lot 1 was moved slightly, five lots could still be developed. . Chair Erickson inquired if there was an Engineer's report. Mr. Fritsinger indicated there is not a . formal response from the Engineer, but his previously stated concerns other than for the cul-de-sac, have been addressed. . Chair Erickson inquired as to the ejector systems. Mr. Ringwald indicated under either plan the lower levels would need ejector systems. In the original plan, three lots required pumps. . Chair Erickson inquired if a private drive would be an option. Mr. Fritsinger indicated when the applicant first brought the plans to staff, a private drive was proposed, but it evolved into a public street. . Chair Erickson inquired if a PUD would still allow for a Single Family development. Mr. Fritsinger indicated this could be considered. . Rye questioned where the tree in the island would get its water from. Mr. Krier indicated an .- agreement would be signed by the City and the applicant in regards to the tree. .