My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 08-14-1995
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
CCP 08-14-1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:10:29 PM
Creation date
11/6/2006 4:31:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> I --- > <br /> ... ',.. --r- - - -~ <br /> - ~i./'~ i <br /> I . Planninl! Commission iVlinutes Pa2:e 5 08/02195 <br /> I Mr. Ringwald nmed this application was receiv.ed prior to July 1, 1995 and does not have a specmc <br /> deadline for action by tile City. .. <br /> I A <br /> . . <br /> Chair Erickson inquired if lheapplicant could increase the garage as long as the nonconforming <br /> portion is not augmented. Mr. Ringwald indicated this was correct, ind staff reels a variance is not <br /> I necessary. YIr. Ringwald read Section'IX, Subpart I. regarding. nonconforming uses. <br /> . <br /> Commissioner Sand inquired ir lhe exact locanon of garage as it relates to the side property line is <br /> I known'; Mr. Ringwald indicated tbere has not been a survey, so it is nm known. <br /> Mr. Doug Swanson, 3232 New Brighton Road, the applicant provided the Planning CommiSSIOn <br /> I with a wrinen presentation regarding their request. He noted they understand the need for building <br /> ordinance. However, tiley fuel that replacing an agmg garage VVlth a more improved structure on the <br /> existing site would only serve to enhance lhe property, nO! detract from It. The ten root setback <br /> I ordinance does nm seem reasonable given the existing site, conditions surrounding it and economic <br /> differences. <br /> I Mr. Swanson indicated he is unable 10 use lhe current garage, it is 20 feet by 20 feet and his truck <br /> does not fit in the garage. He noted the structure is aging rapidly, the wiring is outdated, there is no <br /> I - insulauon, one garage door opens with great difficulty, the other does not open at ail, the roof needs <br /> to be replaced, the floor is crumbling, and the entire fuundation is sinking. <br /> I Commissioner Larson asked for c1arrlication of the size of structure the applicant wishes to construct. <br /> Mr. Swanson noted the dimensions would be 22 feet by 32 feet. <br /> I Mr. Swanson also noted if the structure is put at the current setback the edge would obstruct the view <br /> from his living room window <br /> I CommiSSIOner Larson inquired if the applicanl could adjust the building to the nonh. \;[r. Swanson <br /> indicated it still would obstruct tile view from the living room window. <br /> I Commissioner Rye gave an example of a design that would nm encroach or add to the nonconforming <br /> wall, but would add depth to one side of the garage, he inquired if the applicanr would be able to use <br /> lhis design. Mr. Swanson indicated there is a grade change to the north and it would be diffiC'..llt, <br /> I although possible, but it was his understanding that he could nO! alter the existing structure. <br /> ,.:e ''...,....:r.:...'7'...:SSiC;-:-=~S ::e:c ':lSC;,,;,SSi(:", -:n ";.J.T::OU:::i- cp~:(:r:s .l\':J.ll.lC:2: .2'::-:' .;;:sc.;.;:::s ;-;::;;:.:.:c.:=-:; ::...:-:::::.;:-:::;-::-...:.-'":; <br /> I uses. <br /> Commissioner Larson inquired iflhe applicant could have a survey done, so lhe Planning Commission <br /> I could review the actual footage needed. Mr. Swanson indicated he could have a survey done. <br /> I . <br /> I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.