My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 09-25-1995
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
CCP 09-25-1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:10:33 PM
Creation date
11/6/2006 4:31:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - SEPTEMBER II. 1995 8 <br />I Mayor Probst noted there are three options available to the Council; 1) the item could be deferred <br /> to a later date, 2) Council could establish the need for an EIS, and 3) the Council could establish no <br />I need for the EIS and if so publish the responses to the comments made during public comment of <br /> the EA W. <br />I Councilmember Aplikowski wished to assure the residents that the Council is listening to the <br /> concerns of the citizens, and indicated many hours of reading, meeting and reviewing the issues <br />I goes into the Council's decisions. She noted, even though it may at times be difficult for the <br /> residents to listen to the Council's actions, they are acting on behalf of the community as a whole. <br />I Councilmember Keirn indicated there are three issues to address; first, the archeological survey, <br /> which she believes is not warranted due to lack of evidence, if there were to be a settlement it <br /> would have been on the hilltop to the north of the site, which sits slightly higher than the knoll on <br />I this site; secondly, there is not an estimated significant increase in traffic from the development; <br /> thirdly, the issue of drainage which is still a difficult one, but she indicated many questions can be <br /> answered without the EIS. <br />I Councilmember Keirn inquired if it was Mr. Ringwald's opinion that the increase of lake level was <br />I- mostly due to the significant development between the 1950s and I 970s. Mr. Ringwald felt that was <br /> a fair statement, the requirements for drainage have changed since the 1970s. <br />I Councilmember Malone indicated he has read reports, and listened to comments, and the issue has <br /> been a difficult one. He believed the EA W answers all the questions the Council had. He did not <br /> see a reason to proceed with an EIS. <br />I Councilmember Aplikowski agreed, and felt any additional questions could be answered without an <br /> additional study. <br />I Councilmember Hicks concurred with Councilmembers Aplikowski and Malone. <br />I Mayor Probst inquired if one motion could contain all five requests of staff. City Attorney Filla <br /> indicated item number one should contain identification of the memo ofRLK Associates Ltd. <br />I MOTION: Keirn mov~d, and Aplikowski seconded a motion to adopt the responses to the public <br /> comments in the report ofRLK Associates, Ltd; adopt the Findings of Fact; adopt <br /> a negative declaration on the need for an EIS; authorize staff to distribute the <br />I responses to the public comments; and authorize staff to distribute the decision of the <br /> City Council on the need for an EIS. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br />I Mayor Probst noted this issue has been a difficult one, but felt questions had been answered in the <br /> . EA Wand an EIS would not address any additional questions. <br />I <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.