My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 11-13-1995
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
CCP 11-13-1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:10:38 PM
Creation date
11/6/2006 4:40:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
184
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> - <br /> I -~. <br /> ~ <br /> I. ~~ <br /> - <br /> Travel Demand Mana::ement - <br /> I There are measures and strategies that can be used to reduce travel demand in a corridor or region. IiII1 <br /> Many of these strategies involve actions that fall on the affected Cities to implement. These - <br /> I programs are generally oriented towards work trips and focus on the place of employment. Some - <br /> strategies are more effective than others in reducing trips. The chart on the following page shows <br /> the effectiveness of different strategies on reducing the vehicle trips at an office or other employment - <br /> I oriented land use. The most effective strategies are strategies that reduce the costs of transit or car ~, <br /> pooling or increase the cost for single occupant vehicles. <br /> - <br /> I In order for these strategies to be effective in reducing demand in a corridor or region they generally '""'- <br /> need to be mandatory and as inclusive as possible. Studies in the 1-494 corridor found that programs -, <br /> I that are voluntary were only half as effective at reducing vehicle trips as mandatory programs. The <br /> study also found that it was necessary to include existing land uses as well as new development in .. <br /> order to be effective. The 1-494 studies found that an extremely aggressive travel demand - <br /> I managment program that included employee parking charges, additional transit subsidies, HOV -, <br /> lanes, aggressive employer ridesharing programs, and alternative work arrangements that was <br /> mandatory for all employers would reduce travel demand on 1-494 by about II percent. Although - <br /> I this aggressive program was expected to reduce trip demand at the place of employment where it was -, <br /> required by about 32 percent, the other trips not covered by the program reduced the overall effect <br /> I. on 1-494. <br /> -, <br /> - <br /> I _1___- <br /> - <br /> - <br /> ""., .....'. <br /> I -, <br /> .r-' 0' <br /> - <br /> I - <br /> - <br /> I -',~: <br /> , <br /> I ... <br /> -0" <br /> - <br /> I ~ ----.:.""'" <br /> -- <br /> I -, <br /> . <br /> I. - <br /> - <br /> 17 <br /> -- <br /> I ~I <br /> , <br /> ! <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.