CCP 12-11-1995 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

- . A@EN HILLS CITY COWCIL - NOVEMBER 13. 1995 5 .. Mr. Ringwald noted that the applicant has sixty (60) days from the date of the City Council - . approval to record the final plat or that approval is void. If the final plat is approved tonight, then the approval would become void on Friday, January 12, 1996. . Mr. Ringwald indicated the letter of credit had been received and the Development Agreement was under review of the City Attorney. . City Attorney Filla indicated he had reviewed the letter of credit and is comfortable with the document. He noted that the plat and declarations will be finished and soon recorded. . MOTION: Hicks moved, and Aplikowski seconded a motion to approve Planning Case #95- 05, final plat of Townhomes of Lake Valentine subject to the stated conditions . with the exception of condition number three (3) which has already been met. Mayor Probst allowed public comment at this time. . Ms. Doris Cannif, 3946 Glenview Avenue, indicated there is a stream that will flow from Lake I Valentine due to a plugged culvert and will flood the property under discussion. Mayor Probst indicated this property no longer has a connection to Lake Valentine. Ms. Cannif indicated there is a plugged culvert under Highway 10 that needs to be opened. She -. noted flooding in her back yard this previous August. She felt the Council was ignoring the flooding issue. Mayor Probst reiterated that there is no longer a connection to Lake Valentine I from this property. Councilmember Aplikowski inquired if the City had received any phone calls regarding flooding I on the Ogren property. Mr. Fritsinger indicated he did not receive any calls to his knowledge. Mayor Probst indicated the area that Ms. Cannifis referring to is at Valentine Park, at the intersection of County Road F and Highway 10, not E2 and Highway 10. I Ms. Sharon Turgeon, 1777 Venus A venue, asked for clarification of items in the Planning . Memo regarding distance between Units 5 and 6 and the 66 foot easement; the sediment pond could possibly flood; and also, would the conservation easement be disturbed during the construction. . City Attorney Filla indicated in response to the sedimentation pond issue, that the declarations state that the maintenance of the sedimentation pond is the responsibility of the Association. The . information regarding the sedimentation pond would be presented prior to the sale to any of the purchasing of the units. Mr. Ringwald indicated once the conservation easement is established it would not be disturbed. I He noted in regard to the distance between the 66 foot easement and Units 5 and 6, perhaps to be -. I -