CCP 12-11-1995 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

I I. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - NOVEMBER 13. 1995 6 I .' more clear it could be stated, "The Northwest comer of Unit 6 will be at least 24.5 feet from the - 66 foot easement" . I Mr. Jay Shrankler, 1748 Venus Avenue, indicated the Council gave the applicant direction at the last Council meeting on October 30,1995. Mr. Shrankler asked if the Council now feels . comfortable with modifications. Mayor Probst indicated Council has reviewed an interim plan and the plan addressed their concerns. . Councilmember Hicks noted the street has been widened and the number of units have been reduced, to provide a more open development. I Mr. Ringwald also noted there will also be a catch basin located on the Southwest comer of the property to provide for treatment of all run off from the property. . Dr. Boh Mullin, 1793 Gramsie Road, asked about the conservation easement, in regard to "be allowed to return to natural vegetation". Mr. Ringwald indicated the developer would re- vegetate with natural vegetation that part of the easement which was disturbed due to grading, . within 14 days after the completion of the grading of the area. .- Ms. Bohbi Schatz, 1683 West County Road F, inquired as to the removal of the hill on the site. Mr. Ringwald described the earthwork that would take place on the site. I Councilmember Hicks inquired for clarification if there is any drainage away from the site to Valentine Lake. Mr. Stonehouse indicated there is no drainage into Valentine Lake from this site. I Ms. Turgeon asked if a Landscape Plan had been provided. Also, she asked how the City Code was applied to this case. Mr. Ringwald indicated a Landscape Plan had been reviewed and I shown and approved with the Site PlanlPUD Master Plan. Mr. Ringwald noted at least from the Staff level they had addressed the code in regard to a Single Family Attached Home development. I Mayor Probst indicated a Planned Unit Development is allowed under City Code and Council addressed this case as Single Family Attached development. I Mayor Probst noted this would be the fil1al action by the Council in regard to this development. I Councilmember Aplikowski complimented the citizens involved in this case for all their research and hard work. She reminded the residents that the Council needed to review the rights of all I involved, including the property owner and their right to develop their land. Councilmember Aplikowski indicated although it may not be the opinion of all, she feels the .- development will be a benefit to the community in the future. I