CCP 12-11-1995 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

- ARJ)EN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - NOVEMBER 13.1995 7 .- Ms. Lois Rem, 1670 Glenview Court, indicated the reason for the questions from the residents - '. I was that they wanted the Council to be comfortable with their decision. Ms. Rem provided a letter to be entered in the record as Exhibit 6.c. She requested an - explanation as to how the Ogren development would have gotten from the March plan, approved by Staff & Planning Commission, to its current state without the high level of involvement by I the residents. Mayor Probst indicated the original plan was not approved in March, it had not been reviewed by I the Council until October 10, 1995 where Council established conditions for approval. Mayor Probst expressed great concern for the notion that there was something other than a PUD - request. Mayor Probst indicated he felt the Council had reached a compromise between the developer and . the residents. He indicated although not all agree, there is a basic right to develop your land. This right can not be ignored. . Motion carried unanimously (5-0). -I Resolution #95-78. Ordering- Preliminarv Feasibilitv Reoort in the Matter ofthe 1996 Street Improvement Project City Engineer, Greg Stonehouse indicated the street re-rating was now complete. He provided I the Council with a prioritized list of streets as compiled in accordance with the project schedule and under the direction of Public Works Superintendent Stafford. I Mr. Stonehouse indicated under the new system, streets with PCI ratings less than 60 will require I reconstruction or cold, in-place recycling; street ratings from 61 to 80 will be best maintained with a bituminous overlay; ratings form 81 to 90 will require a seal coat; and those rated above 90 will require no maintenance in the next two to three years. I Mr. Stonehouse indicated a general Feasibility Study will be completed to outline the necessary improvements and associated costs for streets within the first and second priority categories. I This will allow City staff to hold informational meetings with the public in the next several weeks to determine which streets will be reconstructed/rehabilitated in 1996. Following those informational meetings, Staff would revise the Feasibility Study specifically toward the selected I streets, and schedule the formal Public Hearing to allow the project to proceed. MOTION: Hicks moved, and Keirn seconded a motion to adopt Resolution #95-78, Ordering I Preliminary Feasibility Report in the Matter of the 1996 Street Improvement Project. Motion carried unanimously (5-0). -. I