CC 02-13-2006 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. . . - ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - February 13, 2006 6 Council member Holdeu asked if they could require a condition that would inelude a noise plan. Mr. Lehnhoff responded they could revise condition 6 to say: The applicmt shall be required to install noise mitigation measures if the City receives complaints regarding noise generated by the unit and the complaints are validated by City Staff for the decibels levels not to exceed 73 decibels, at 30 feet from the unit. MOTION: Mayor Aplikowski moved and Councilmember Grant seconded a motion to approve the amendment to Condition 6. The motion carried unaJlimously (4-0) The original motion carried (3-1 Councilmember Holden opposed). F. Planninl! Case #06-004: St. Paul Lodl!e #2 I.O.O.F. (Odd Fellows), 1174 Edl!ewater Avenue North - Minor Subdivision and Consolidation Mr. Lehnhoff stated the applicants own a 1.54 acre property at 1174 Edgewater Avenue North. On March 8, 2005, the City Council approved an amendment (Case 05-03) to the Lodge's original Special Use Permit #70-36. The amendment allowed the Lodge to reduce the size of their parking lot with the intent of selling three lots on the eastern edge of the property. The amendment was approved with seven conditions. Condition three is the reason for this minor subdivision and consolidation application. Lots 1, 2, and 3 are all non-confonning in the R-2 Zone with slightly less than 5,000 square feet each. However, when combined, the three lots meet the minimum requirements of the R-2 Zone. In order to eliminate the potential of development on each of the three individual, non-conforming lots, the City has required the applicant to consolidate the three lots into one conforming lot. This applicmt seeks to complete condition three of Planning Case 05-03. He noted at the regular Planning Commission meeting of Febmary I, 2006, the Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the minor subdivision and consolidation subject to five conditions as noted in staffs February 6, 2006 report. Council member Graut stated it seemed wrong to him to base the value of these parcels on the value of land that has a substmtial amount of lakefront considering these parcels did not have lakefront. He stated he was in favor of basing the value on surrounding lots of similar size. He indicated he was in support of staffs calculation of $4,896.00 for the park dedication fee and he would not be in favor of waiving the park dedication fee in this case because this was a requirement of other applicants and he did not see the reason to totally waive the park dedication fee. Couneilmembers Holden and Pellegrin agreed with Councilmember Grant's recommendation. H. R Pogue, Treasurer, St. Paul Lodge #2, I.O.O.F., stated he had written up his memo at staffs direction. He noted he had forgotten to add in an added expense of putting in a concrete curb in the new parking lot and put landscaping around that are, which would be another $5,000 -