My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-24-24-SWS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2024
>
06-24-24-SWS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2024 1:51:50 PM
Creation date
6/20/2024 4:49:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION—JUNE 24, 2024 8 <br /> sports facility offers advantages that Costco would not offer and if Alatus wants vibrancy in the <br /> downtown area, this would provide that though it comes with a price tag. <br /> A discussion ensued about what a potential sports facility could include and potential next steps. <br /> A discussion ensued regarding potential impacts on zoning, including the JDA's role in the <br /> decision making process for a potential sports facility. <br /> Council consensus was to direct staff to continue collecting information and to invite the partners <br /> that are proposing the sports facility to present to the City Council at a future worksession. Staff <br /> was directed to add this to the list of potential future topics. <br /> City Administrator Perrault explained possible next steps in moving forward with a potential <br /> single hauler for the city. He suggested waiting until the recycling RFP process that is being <br /> facilitated by the technical advisor, Foth, is complete before making a decision regarding a single <br /> trash hauler. He explained there will be a timing component to implementing a single trash hauler <br /> along with a recycling hauler. He reiterated he would prefer to wait to address the single trash <br /> hauler issue until a new recycling contract is put in place. <br /> Councilmember Holden asked about the planning process and if public engagement would be <br /> included. <br /> City Administrator Perrault suggested waiting for Foth to provide assistance with the process <br /> and noted that public participation could be a component should Council want to include such. <br /> Discussion ensued about the options of a referendum or survey regarding a single hauler in order <br /> to gauge public interest, road conditions and the effects of multiple haulers versus a single hauler, <br /> and Mounds View's experience with the process. <br /> Discussion ensued regarding the varying fees that garbage carriers charge and that the State has <br /> mandated the process cities must follow during consideration of implementing a single hauler. <br /> Councilmember Holden suggested the Council have an internal process figured out prior to <br /> engaging the public with a survey. <br /> Councilmember Monson asked about timing and if the Council would be in favor of revisiting <br /> this topic following completion of the recycling RFP, such as in January. <br /> Council briefly discussed the fact that the TCAAP redevelopment will be a single hauler. <br /> City Administrator Perrault stated that if Council agreed, staff could bring the process back for <br /> discussion following completion of the recycling RFP, so January at the latest, and Council could <br /> determine at that time if it wants to pursue a single hauler in 2025 or 2026. <br /> Councilmember Holden stated that could work if the recycling contract is for 3 years but not if it <br /> is for 5 years. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.