Laserfiche WebLink
IllSummary of January, 2008 meeting <br /> Time of assessment: City Council needs to be informed of the impacts of timing. If <br /> assessments are levied at the beginning of the project, the City will not have to front the <br /> money. However, if assessments are levied upon project completion, residents will be <br /> assessed for actual costs, ensuring that residents aren't over/underpaying. <br /> Overhead costs: List what is included in determining overhead costs, but don't list a <br /> fixed percentage- allow this to be modified for each project(ie, engineering fees, legal <br /> fees, etc.) <br /> Appraisals: Complete property appraisals as needed if/when assessments are appealed. <br /> Interest rate: Modify language so that interest rate is not set to prime rate plus two <br /> percent, but something that moves with the economy, such as two percent over going <br /> bond rate for the type of project being proposed. <br /> Other discussion points: <br /> • Consider a longer payment period for commercial/tax-exempt properties <br /> • Change the assessment payments to be equal annual installments instead of equal <br /> principal payments. <br /> Outstanding discussion points:• <br /> ■ Commercial properties are being assessed 70%; residential properties 50%. Is <br /> 70% an appropriate rate for commercial properties? Is 50% an appropriate rate for <br /> residential properties? <br /> • Addressing double frontage lots, whether it is two streets(non-corner) or street <br /> and alley. <br /> • Do we want to set a minimum number of years between assessments? <br /> • How should City lots be addressed in relation to assessments? Included or not <br /> included in calculations? <br /> Roseville Funding Summary <br /> Roseville adopted a Pavement Management Program (PMP) in 1985 that had a two prong <br /> funding approach. A Roseville street reconstruction project was funded using a <br /> combination of bonding and assessments. The policy was to assess 25%of the <br /> reconstruction costs to properties zoned single family residential, 70% for high density <br /> residential, and 100% for all other property zoning, including institutional uses. The City <br /> Council changed this policy in 2003 to apply the 25% of reconstruction costs to be <br /> assessed for all property zoning. Roseville's PMP also established a tax levy in 1986 to <br /> create the Street Infrastructure fund. This fund is dedicated to major street maintenance, <br /> such as mill and overlay projects. This fund has grown considerably over the years and <br /> now funds 100% of non Municipal State Aid Street mill and overlay projects. All <br /> Roseville taxable properties paid over the years in order to establish this fund. <br /> • <br /> \\Metro-inet.us\ardenhills\PR&PW\Engineering\Assessment_Policy\Summaryof Jan08_mtg.doc <br />