My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCWS 07-10-2006
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
CCWS 07-10-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:10:48 PM
Creation date
11/9/2006 9:18:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> ~ <br /> . ~HILLS <br /> Approved: 7/31/06 <br /> CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA <br /> CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION <br /> JULY 10,2006; 8:52 P.M. <br /> ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS <br /> CALL TO ORDER <br /> Mayor Aplikowski called the meeting to order at 8:52 p.m. <br /> Present: Mayor Aplikowski, Councilmembers: Brenda Holden, Gregg Larson, <br /> David Grant and Vincent Pellcgrin. <br /> Absent: None <br /> Staff Present: City Administrator, Michelle Wolfe; Assistant City Administrator, <br /> . Schawn Johnson; and Recreation Supervisor, Michelle Olson. <br /> Operations and Maintenanee Department Orl!anizational Strueture <br /> City Administrator Michelle Wolfe provided the City Council with an overview of four different <br /> organizational charts that are being proposed for the Operations and Maintenance Department. <br /> Chart A illustrates the structure that preceded the current structure. The Chart A structure <br /> allows more focused attention on parks, trails and recreation due to the separation from public <br /> works. The wcakncsses of this structure are that you lose flexibility from your labor pool; it adds <br /> another management position and department to the City structure which includes added costs, <br /> and potentially weakens the ability to pool resources as needed. <br /> Chart B illustratcs the current structure. Strengths of this structure include increased flexibility <br /> from the labor pool, operating and cost efficiencies, less management overhead, and cross <br /> training opportunities. A potential weakness is the concern that some areas ofthe Operations and <br /> Maintenance Department may not be maintained as efficiently. <br /> Chart C illustrates somewhat of a hybrid between Charts A and B. It contemplatcs splitting out <br /> some of the Parks and Recreation activities from O&M and changing the name of the department <br /> . back to Public Works. However, it maintains the labor pool concept for maintenance of parks <br /> and trails and other related activities. Parks planning and recreation activities would be managed <br /> ----- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.