My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCWS 07-10-2006
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
CCWS 07-10-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:10:48 PM
Creation date
11/9/2006 9:18:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION - JULY 10,2006 2 <br /> . by a position labeled Parks, Trails, and Recreation Manager, which reports to the Public Works <br /> Director. As envisioned this position operates similar to an Assistant Public Works Director <br /> responsible for managing parks and recreation. Equally important is that this structure <br /> contemplates future growth in that the Parks and Recreation Manager position can be upgraded <br /> to a Parks and Recreation Director in the future as needed. <br /> Chart D illustrates an option that splits parks, trails, and recreation responsibilities three ways. <br /> It also contemplates the possibility of incorporating the City Engineer position into the Public <br /> Works Director position, increasing our engineering expertise on staff. The Recreation <br /> Supervisor position would function as it currently does, except that the position would report <br /> directly to the City Administrator and not to the Public Works Director. The Conununity <br /> Development Department would handle parks and facilities planning. The labor pool would be <br /> maintained in the Public Works Department. The potential advantages are that it allows each of <br /> the three areas to be separatcly focused on, without having to add additional staff. Another <br /> potential advantage is that we may be able to add engineering expertise and experience to the <br /> staff, which would also potentially increase the value of the Director position and hence the <br /> recruitment pool of qualified candidates. <br /> City Administrator Michelle Wolfe rccommcnded Option C to the City Council on the basis of <br /> the following reasons: <br /> . Provides flexibility for the Public Works Department to grow in the future; <br /> . Proposes the creation of a Parks, Trails, and Recreation Manager position to oversee the <br /> . recreation and park planning areas; <br /> . Maintains the City's current labor pool structure for completing maintenance related <br /> activities. <br /> Councilmember Holden asked why the manager position would be named the Parks, Trails, and <br /> Recreation Manager. <br /> City Administrator Wolfe said that common terminology for this position is Parks and <br /> Recreation Manager. <br /> Councilmember Grant recommended that the Parks, Trails, and Recreation Manager be classified <br /> as a Rccreation Supervisor position. <br /> Mayor Aplikowski said that it has been difficult for the City to recruit and keep quality staff <br /> members for an extended period of time. It is important for the City to find the right person that <br /> meets the City's public works and recreation needs. <br /> City Administrator Wolfe said that the ideal candidate for the Public Works Director position <br /> would be an individual that has good management and leadership skills. It is also important for <br /> the City to capitalize on the abilities of our current Recreation Supervisor. <br /> . Councilmember Holden said that she is comfortable with option C. She would like to have trails <br /> removed from the proposed Parks, Trails, and Recreation Manager title. <br /> --- ---- ---- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.