My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 08-28-2006
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
CC 08-28-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:10:49 PM
Creation date
11/9/2006 9:18:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL -AUGUST 28, 2006 <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />Mike Aamoth, 3550 Ridgewood Road, stated he had received some information from the City <br />that was inaccurate and was not clear. He stated this was a problem and an inconvenience for the <br />residents. He recommended the construction company be more accurate. He asked if there was <br />any place he could go and look at the bids submitted for this project from the various construction <br />companies. Ms. Wolfe stated the bids were available at City Hall and ifhe left his name with the <br />City Engineer, they would be provided to him. <br /> <br />Mr. Aamoth asked if there was an assessment meeting in June. He noted initially he was told the <br />assessment was going to be around $7,000 and now it went up 45 percent. He stated he was <br />concerned the project had now been started and there was no assessment hearing. Ms. Giga <br />stated the feasibility report was done last August and there might have been a tentative schedule in <br />that report. <br /> <br />Ms. Wolfe stated initially they thought the assessment hearing would be held earlier than it ended <br />up being_ She indicated in the feasibility study they estimated between $6,500 and $8,800 for the <br />assessment, but the bids came in higher than anticipated. <br /> <br />Mr. Aamoth stated it would be nice if there was better communication all around. Ms. Giga <br />stated they were distributing information as best they could, but the contractor's schedule often <br />changes hour by hour and not day by day_ If the contractor conveys the information in a timely <br />manner the City will do their best to distribute the information. <br /> <br />Lisa Abraham, 3511 Siems Court, asked if everyone had received the letter she sent. She stated <br />if they were going to go back and consider lots in different areas, the Island Lake Beach Club also <br />had two separate areas, which were having their fees waived_ She requested they look at this also. <br />She stated her assessment should be waived because of her driveway access. Ms. Wolfe stated <br />the basis for not assessing the Beach Club was because the parcels were not developable. <br /> <br />Ms. Abraham believed there was a value to the islands and it should probably be assessed <br />accordingly. <br /> <br />Jennie Michael, 3436 Siems Court asked how many units was the Beach Club. Ms. Giga <br />responded it was two parcels. <br /> <br />Ms. Michaels noted the parcels were huge and a lot of residents did not use the Beach Club and <br />therefore, they should not have to pay for that portion. She stated she was under the impression <br />the City was going to pick up the shortfall difference between the estimate and the bid. Ms. <br />Wolfe responded the City had increased their contribution to the project. <br /> <br />Tom Mulcahy, 3530 Siems Court, stated when he was working and a project came in as much <br />over budget as this one did, they would ask who should be fired. He stated they needed an <br />explanation as to why the costs came in so high. He stated if they had a feasibility study in <br />August 2005 he believed they should rely on that feasibility study and why was the feasibility <br />study so inaccurate. He asked if the City just accepted the bids. Councilmember Larson noted <br />the City was subject to the market fluctuations at the time and in this instance that was what had <br />happened. He stated they had met with the contractor to come up with some changes to reduce <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.