Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL -AUGUST 28, 2006 <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />the cost. He indicated they were not happy that this had happened, but that this is part of the <br />process when going out for public bids. <br /> <br />Mayor Aplikowski stated they had to have some help in paying for the project and that is how <br />they got where they were. <br /> <br />Mayor Aplikowski continued the public hearing until September 11, 2006_ <br /> <br />7. NEW BUSINESS <br /> <br />A. Planninl! Case 06-024: Planned Unit Development Amendment & Site Plan Review; <br />Boston Scientific: 4100 Hamline Avenue North <br />Mr. Lehnhoff stated the applicant was requesting a Master Plan POD (7th) Amendment and Site <br />Plan Review to construct a 10,225 square foot addition to Building N, which is located in the <br />northwestern portion of the Boston Scientific campus. The building was purchased just before the <br />Master Plan was approved in 2002, and the Master Plan does not reflect the proposed addition to <br />this application, which is the reason for the POD Amendment- <br /> <br />According to the applicant, the addition will be used to integrate a new product component into an <br />existing manufacturing process and approximately ten employees would be added to Building N <br />with this addition. The applicant has submitted a landscaping plan. No parking stalls would be <br />removed or added with this proposal; however, the applicant has indicated that there is sufficient <br />parking space on the campus and a proof of parking had been submitted. <br /> <br />The proposal in this application would be the second addition to Building N. A 38,000 square <br />foot addition was approved in 2003_ The planning case report reviews all of the additions and <br />amendments to the Master Plan and to the campus since 2002_ <br /> <br />He stated the Planning Commission reviewed Planning Case 06-024 and unanimously <br />recommended approval of the Planned Unit Development Amendment and Site Plan Review <br />based on the submitted plans and a finding that the proposal would not have negative impact on <br />the neighborhood or City if the following thirteen conditions are included: <br /> <br />1. <br /> <br />The applicant shall continue to abide by the conditions of approval as stated in the <br />approved Master Plan POD except as amended by the six subsequent amendments_ <br />A PUD Amendment form, drafted by the City Attorney, shall amend the PUD and <br />encompass all seven amendments to the Master Plan POD. A building permit may <br />only be issued after the POD Amendment document receives the approval of the <br />City Conncil and is executed by both the City Council and the applicant. <br />The project shall be completed in accordance with the plans submitted as part of <br />the master plan amendment and site plan review application. Any significant <br />changes to these plans, as determined by the City Planner, shall require review and <br />approval by the Planning Commission. <br />The master plan amendment and site plan review shall automatically expire and <br />become void one (1) year from and after the date on which the Council granted <br />such approval if work on the project has not begun within that time period_ <br /> <br />2. <br /> <br />3. <br /> <br />4_ <br />