Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - SEPTEMBER II, 2006 <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />Councilmember Pellegrin rejoined the meeting at 9:25 p,m. <br /> <br />MOTION: Councilmember Grant moved and Councilmember Larson seconded a <br />motion to adopt Resolution 06,45 which establishes Truth in Taxation <br />hearing dates for proposed taxes payable in 2007. The dates established are <br />December 4th and December II, 2006, The motion carried unanimously (5, <br />0), <br /> <br />D. Boston Scientific Water Sil!nal!e Discussion <br /> <br />Mr. Lehnhoff stated with the recent acquisition of Guidant by Boston Scientific, they plan to <br />replace the Guidant signage with Boston Scientific signage. Based on a preliminary review of <br />their wall and monument sign proposal, no special permits will be needed because the new <br />signage will not exceed the sign area or dimensions of the old signage (a regular sign permit will <br />still be required for each sign that is visible from the public right-of-way or neighboring <br />properties). However, Boston Scientific is considering changing the dimensions and possibly the <br />color of the signage on their water tower. <br /> <br />Dan Riehle, Facilities Manager for Boston Scientific, stated Boston Scientific had more letters <br />than Guidant did and he did not believe the size of the lettering would matter on the water tower, <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant stated given the prominence of the water tower and the sign this needed <br />to come before Council. He asked what was the size of the letters being proposed to be put up, <br />Mr. Riehle responded the "B" and "s" would be bigger than 24", <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant asked Council if this was what they wanted, <br /> <br />MOTION: Councilmember Larson moved and Councilmember Pellegrin seconded a <br />motion to approve the Boston Scientific Water Tower Signage and it be <br />deemed an insignificant change and did not require Boston Scientific to go <br />through the planning process, <br /> <br />Conncilmember Holden stated she was surprised the City was restrictive on other signage within <br />the City and not on this property also. <br /> <br />The motion carried unanimously (5,0), <br /> <br />8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS <br /> <br />Mr. Lehnhoffrequested Council hear item 8C prior to 8A. <br /> <br />C. Planninl! Case 01-05: Chesapeake Companies - Extension of Master PUD <br /> <br />Mr. Lehnhoff stated the applicant has requested an additional one-year extension for their Master <br />Plan PUD. <br />