My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 09-11-2006
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
CC 09-11-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:10:49 PM
Creation date
11/9/2006 9:18:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - SEPTEMBER II, 2006 <br /> <br />9 <br /> <br />Councilmember Hoiden stated she had a concern regarding the 6% levy and she would not <br />support it. She noted the City was expecting significant funds to come in the next year. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant stated he also would not support a 6% levy and staff came to them with a <br />4% initially. He stated the more extras tbey tacked on, those extras would eventually get spent. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson stated he did support the motion and noted the City has been very <br />conservative in the way it approached levies compared to other Cities, He noted a lot of things the <br />City wanted to do they could not do because they did not have sufficient funds. He stated it was <br />not irresponsible in talking about a six percent versus a four percent increase, <br /> <br />Councilmember Pellegrin asked if they were making money on the embezzlement. Mr. <br />Johnson responded it was his understanding they were only getting a portion of the money back <br />and not the total sum and they were not making money on this. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson noted the money they recovered from the embezzlement was not a <br />windfall for the City and it was money that was originally stolen from the City in the first place. <br /> <br />Mayor Aplikowski stated she would support the 6% levy and she did not think it was <br />irresponsible to give staff more time, She noted they could be looking at a 4% levy in December, <br />but she wanted to give staff some latitude, <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden stated she did not believe they had agreed on the capital improvement <br />projects they wanted to do, She noted they have not been maintaining the road, parks, trails, and <br />tennis courts. She stated this was inappropriate and she would not support it. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant stated if the utility rates were too low, then they needed to raise the utility <br />rates, He stated the utility funds were too low because they were spending too much, He noted <br />they needed to be more fiscally responsible and they should be taxing for what they need, He <br />stated staff had come to them with a four percent budget and he did not believe they should raise it <br />to six percent. Mayor Aplikowski stated staff had indicated they would try to keep the levy at <br />four percent. <br /> <br />Councilmember Pellegrin stated he was also not sure he was in favor of the 6% levy. He noted <br />they had to get out of the pay me later mode, <br /> <br />The motion carried unanimously (3-2 Councilmembers Grant and Holden opposed). <br /> <br />Councilmember Pellegrin left the meeting at 9:24 p.m, <br /> <br />MOTION: Councilmember Grant moved and Councilmember Larson seconded a <br />motion to adopt Resolution 06-44 which establishes the preliminary levy <br />for the Karth Lake Improvement District for taxes payable 2007 in the <br />amount of $13,782.67. The motion carried unanimously (4,0 <br />Councilmember Pellegrin absent for the vote), <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.