CC 02-24-1960 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. . 26 . kind of money. It won't be possible for each individual to have a vote on this sort of think. I'm wondering if this is really representation when you have four-fifths of the Council pass on something that might cost me $3,000. ~R. POPOVICH: There is no answer except that elections are never held, on them. You can't tell me one village that ever voted on a sanitary sewer system. ~'F.. OLLON: 'lie had one vote on this and it was voted down. VR. ?O?OVICH: That was on a bond issue for levying over the entire village and making it a full faith General Obligation Bond. None of this is general obligation. this is all special assessment. hhere you have special assessment it's done this way. . The only other utilities thing you vote on is water because on that the law reyuires that you must vote. However, the various interim committees that are studying it are going to recommend to the next legislature that you don't even vote on water - that you do the same as all other improvements. This is local improvement code and sewers, parks, playgrounds, tree cutting, streets going in, burbing, black topping are all done under the local improvement code without an election. ~R. J0HNRYSGAARD: 1744 No. Pascal: I had one comment with respect to the amparisons given here before. The comparisons in cost between Falcon Heights, which incidentally I participated in and paid at that time, and the Roseville figures. There was a vast difference I believe in the specifications regarding those ... two jobs iosofar as the back filling and street maintenance. In Falcon Heights the streets were re-built following the completion of the sewer project. NR. SHORT: There is no estimate of cost included for street