My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 02-24-1960
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1960-1969
>
1960
>
CC 02-24-1960
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:10:58 PM
Creation date
11/9/2006 10:45:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />28 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />sewer contractor that would do the sewer construction probably <br />will sublet the street construction to somebody else and there is <br />an additional handling charge on it so there are certain things <br />that it is felt that it's cheaper to do it as two separate items <br />at t~o separate times and in this case with some of your streets <br />being just~n oiled surface there would be substantial to gain <br />by wa it i ng . <br />~R. SHORT: Another fact to compare Falcon Heights and Arden <br />Hills. Arden Hills is more clay than sand. Sand will remain <br />relatively stable after the work is completed whereas you can <br />pack clay until the cows come home and still following a frost <br />it will tend to soften up so as ~I. Popovich said it's hard to <br />compare one with another on all conditions because conditions are <br />just different as to soil and other things. <br />MP.S. BILL WOLF, 3170 No. Hamline: I was wondering what the <br />comparison was of our improvements on Number 1 and 2 as compared <br />with this estimate on 3. ahat the footage costs are. <br />NAYOR ASHBACH: I know the estimate for Improvement No. 1 was <br />$12.50 a frent foot. It came out cheaper than that. That has not <br />been worked out yet. <br />~R. POPOVICH: In Number 1 it was $12.60 a front foot and Nc. 2 <br />it was $10.50 a front foot sc we're a little less here. The reason <br />for it in Improvement No. I, it was such a small ;:>roject and yet <br />you had certain costs involved irrespective of the number of homes. <br />~R. SHORT: I think the principal reason for the difference - <br />~RS. ~OLF: I meant between $120,000 and $600,000. <br />hR. SHORT: Because of the size of the improvement. <br />NAYOR ASHBACH: Any other questions? <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.