Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> E1UC W. ROTHMoALEIl, 1555 Glenhill: Asked if there would <br /> be a t1me limit in which to connect the water and i.f he could <br /> contillue to use how own well water for spr1nk1ing. Also wanted <br /> to know what provisions had been made for fire hydrants~ <br /> MaS. RICHARD ASB'l'ON, 3188 N. Asbury: Asked how the corner <br /> lots would be assessed. <br /> MARIE ALEXANDER, 3265 N. Snelling: Not: included in the <br /> improvement area. <br />. MONROE KRONSTED'l'# 1523 Edgewater: Asked hoW many names were <br /> included on the petition for water. said that he favored going <br /> ahead with the improvement iJaediately. <br /> KENNB'l'H LUl(ASJ(A, 3125 Asbury: In favor of construc1:ing the <br /> improvement immediately. <br /> WILLDM KRUEGER, 3160 Ridgewood: In favor of the improvement. <br /> WARD HANSON, 1538 Glenhill: In favor of construc~1ng the <br /> UlproYement immediately. <br /> DAVID CAHLANDER (Spoke before): Thought there should be a <br /> unit assessment rather thaa a front foot assessment, <br /> FROM 'l'HE AUDIENCE: Asked specifically where the water <br /> lines would be laid and how much of the streets would have to be <br /> damaged. <br /> ERIC w. ROTBMALER, 1555 Glenhill (Spoke before): wanted <br /> to know when the construction could be completed. <br /> MONROE KRONSTED'r (Spoke before): Asked if the property <br /> owners in the improvement area should determine where they want <br /> the connection to their home. <br /> RICHARD MOSES, 3136 Ridgewood 8Oad: At the t1me he had <br /> the sewer connected he had a one inch copper water tube put in <br /> the same trench. Asked if he could use this or wou~d have to <br /> put another l1ne in for water ten feet away from the sanitary <br /> sewer connection. <br /> PROM THE AUDIENCE: Inquired about the time schedule for <br /> construction and whether or not all the work could be completed <br /> before winter. <br /> ERIC W. RO'l'HMALEIl, 1555 Glenhill: Just had a new apron put <br />. 1n his driveway and wanted to know i.f the street would be re- <br /> constrllCted the same as it is now. <br /> DONALD BLAISDELL, representing Nazareth Hall: They are being <br /> considered commercial property with an assessment of $7.50 per <br /> front foot rather than residential property with an assessment of <br /> $5 per front foot. They would prefer being considered residential. <br /> Mr. Blaisdell pointed out that Nazareth Hall will have a long con- <br /> nection line to pay for 1n addlti.on to a large meter and pJ;obably <br /> a few hydrants of their own. <br />