Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—SEPTEMBER 9, 2024 10 <br /> Mr. Fink stated the church has been very gracious and cooperative when it comes to the timing <br /> of this project. He indicated he would go back and review the contractual agreement with the <br /> church to ensure he was still in compliance with the timing change. He explained there was a <br /> possibility this would still work out, otherwise he would have to request additional flexibility <br /> from the church. <br /> Councilmember Monson reported she did not want to put this project at risk, if the developer <br /> was supposed to meet certain milestones. <br /> Mr. Fink stated it was his understanding the next round of applications would include a final plat, <br /> vacation of easements, site plan or development plan and the rezoning. <br /> Interim City Administrator Jagoe reported this was the case, along with a conditional use <br /> permit for the multi-family dwelling and a PUD. <br /> Mr. Fink stated adding one more application to this next round should not change the timing for <br /> this project. <br /> Interim City Administrator Jagoe stated this was correct. She indicated it seems clean to table <br /> the rezoning, if the City can get consent from the applicant to extend beyond the 120 days. <br /> Councilmember Rousseau questioned if the noise and quality of life issue would be addressed <br /> by the developer. <br /> Mr. Fink commented since the Planning Commission meeting, he engaged a qualified sound <br /> consultant to conduct noise studies on County Road 96 and Highway 10. He hoped to have the <br /> results from this study by the end of the month. <br /> Mayor Grant discussed the location of the proposed building and asked if the church would be <br /> using any of the parking adjacent to the proposed building. <br /> Mr. Fink stated this was not his intention. <br /> Further discussion ensued regarding the constraints on the property in terms of the overall <br /> footprint. <br /> Councilmember Holden asked which page has the drainage grading information. <br /> Senior Planner Fransen reported this information was available on Page C7. <br /> Councilmember Holden questioned how many feet above Highway 10 would this property be <br /> built. <br /> Mr. Fink indicated he could not answer this. <br /> Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen stated the elevation at the of the highway <br /> was 912 and the western portion of the building would have an elevation of 922. <br />