My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-31-24 EDC Minutes
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Economic Development Commission (EDC)
>
EDC Minutes
>
2024
>
07-31-24 EDC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/4/2024 11:53:01 AM
Creation date
11/4/2024 11:52:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION – JULY 31, 2024 6 <br />EDA thought there is value in having the EDC look at this in terms of it being a gateway to the <br />city and support what the businesses might see as the main corridors. A bigger discussion is would <br />flags on the street lights help establish the street frontage and support what the businesses feel <br />might help establish their presence. <br /> <br />Commissioner Bonine answered there are a lot of signs. He believes the item should wait. The <br />point of the EDC is the better understand who the businesses are. He thinks it would be a poor use <br />of funds until the commission gets to know the business owners first. He suggested that may be a <br />good follow up after the current task to reach out to the contacts and see if they would value a <br />downtown feel with monument signs or the other options mentioned. He thinks it would be <br />irresponsible to move forward until the businesses can weigh in. Commissioner Williams pointed <br />out Rice Creek Commons has no businesses there now but that may be a location for consideration <br />after it’s developed. Commissioner Bonine agreed. Discussion ensued regarding Shoreview’s <br />signs and if it’s really necessary for Arden Hills to follow suit. Commissioner Gronquist agreed <br />that it is a lot of signs to advertise the city. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Jagoe summarized that she heard there is value in looking <br />at this topic along with how to support the commercial corridors, however, there is no urgency for <br />the city to move forward with a large gateway sign, at this time. Commissioner Williams pointed <br />out that he has two gateway signs near his house in fully residential areas. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Jagoe stated that gateway signs can serve a dual purpose. <br />Yes, they help establish a presence when visitors enter the community. She, also believes there is <br />value in establishing the commercial corridor. Commissioner Bonine said he believes more <br />information is needed about the businesses in order to spend the money wisely. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Jagoe summarized she heard this is an item that should <br />remain on the work plan however for budgetary purposes, funds should not be held or prioritized <br />for 2025. <br /> <br />Council Liaison Tom Fabel thought this was a productive discussion and the topic should be <br />brought back to the council. <br /> <br /> <br />4. COMMENTS AND REPORTS <br /> <br />A. Staff Updates <br /> <br />None <br /> <br />B. City Council Updates <br /> <br />City Council Liaison Fabel shared his appreciation for the outreach efforts the commission is <br />undertaking. He hopes they will take the opportunity to ask businesses what they think the city is <br />doing well and where improvements can be made and then share them with city council. <br /> <br />City Council Liaison Fabel gave a brief history of the Rice Creek Commons area. He noted there <br />is currently a $40 million funding gap that needs to be filled before anything can move forward. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.