Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br />. <br /> <br />. <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />MR. JEROME D. TINM, 1400 CWlllll1ngs Lanel Asked the <br />following: 1) What water pressure could be expected out of <br />eight inch mainsl 2) Is the street restoration included <br />in the cost of the water improvement, or will there be an <br />extra charge for that workl 3) Is it possiDle to run the <br />sanitary sewer line in the same trench with the water pipe. <br /> <br />MR. KEITH EWY, 1176 Carlton: What would happen to the <br />to the boulevard trees when the water line is constructed. <br />Also wanted to know if the old pumps could continue to be <br />used for lawn sprinkling. Asked if there was a Dooster <br />pUlllp between the tank in Roseville and his property. Further <br />asked if he would be guaranteed a certain min1mum water <br />pressure. <br /> <br />MR. W. FOREST BEAR, 1305 Tiller Lane: Asked for an <br />explanation of the trunk charge. Also asked what the <br />assessment would be on a corner lot. <br /> <br />MR. GEORGE CHUTKA, 1466 Skiles Lane: He also abuts a <br />road at the rear of his property and wanted to know what the <br />assessment would be. Asked if it was mandatory to connect to <br />the water line. <br /> <br />MR. BURT SCHERFENBERG, 1155 Ingerson Road: Indicated that <br />he didn't think the trees or sod had been properly or adequately <br />replaced after the sanitary sewer work was done and hoped that <br />there would be more engineering supervision. Wanted to know <br />if the treatment of trees would be the same on the street as <br />on a county road where you have the county road width. <br />Asked if the water construction would be on the north or south <br />side of Ingerson Road. The sewer was put in on the north <br />side of the street and the trees were never replaced. He <br />suggested that the water be put in on the north side of the <br />street rather than take out the trees that are left on the <br />south side. Also asked if the two previous water improvements <br />ordered in 1968 had been included in the mill rate shown in <br />the water hearing brochure. <br /> <br />MR. BRAD LEMBERG, 35 MelDourne Avenue S.E., Minneapolis - <br />owns Lot 14, Block 3, Arden Hills No.2: If the contracts <br />for the construction of the water improvement are lower than <br />anticipated, would the assessment charge or the mill levy <br />be reduced. Also wanted to know if water revenues would be <br />used to lower the mill rate. Further asked if it was the <br />policy of the village to replace damaged lawns with cultured <br />sod. Plans to build in the fall and asked what procedure <br />would have to be followed to put the sewer stull in at the <br />same time the water goes in. <br /> <br />MR. WALTER T. MILLER, 1309 Cantlon: wanted to know the <br />location of the water construction in relation to his property. <br />Also asked what the rate would be per thousand gallons of <br />water . <br />