Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />lib:. Ronald Herrick, 1860 Lake Lane~ Asked if the COuncil <br />or Water Study Committee had extended any effort or made any <br />plans to obtain state aid or federal funds for the improvement. <br />Also wanted to know if other village funds could be transferred <br />and used to pay for the improvement. <br /> <br />Mr. Harry Ehlers, 3256 New Brighton Road: Commented on the <br />faulty workmanship in water improvements which have already been <br />constructed. <br /> <br />~ir. Carl Christensen, 3122 Shorewood Drive: <br />or not it was compulsory to connect to the water <br />mentioned that FHA requires an overhead tank and <br />the village would have an elevated tank. <br /> <br />l.sked whether <br />system. Also <br />wanted to know if <br /> <br />~ir. John Drews, 1926 Stowe (Spoke before): Asked if this <br />was the first water improvement to serve a residential area. Also <br />asked about problems Roseville was having with St. Paul in con- <br />nection with water charges. <br /> <br />Mr. Phil Pfeilsticker, 1431 Arden Place: Not included in the <br />improvement, and wanted to know how his area could get water. <br /> <br />Mr. Don Kostohryz, 1405 West Arden Place: Informed Mr. <br />Pfeilsticker that a petition has been started in his area and <br />asked if any engineering plans had been made for that portion of <br />the village. Also asked if it wouldn't be cheaper to contract <br />for that area along with the area under discussion at the hearing. <br /> <br />Mr. Leonard Carlson, 2034 Stowe Avenue: Asked if the <br />connection from the home to the main in the street could be done <br />by the individual homeowner or if it would have to be done by a <br />contractor. <br /> <br />Mr. Morris Papenfuss, 1894 West County Road E: Asked if <br />homeowners would be assessed with any additional charges if they <br />didn't connect to the water systen. <br /> <br />1'1r. John Trump, 1871 Beckman: Asked about the water <br />service connection standards. <br /> <br />~ir. Leo Elizer, 1863 Noble Road: (Spoke before) Asked if <br />New Brighton had been considered as a source of water. <br /> <br />A resolution adopted by the Arden Hills Jaycees in favor <br />of the improvement was read. <br /> <br />fir. John Drews, 1926 Stowe (Spoke before): Thought a larger <br />area should be encompassed in the improvement. <br /> <br />From the audience (No name given): Said he's not happy <br />with constructing the improverr~nt piecemeal. <br /> <br />Mr. Fay Kennedy, 3453 Lake Johanna Boulevard (Spoke before): <br />In favor of the improvement. <br />