My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-14-24-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2024
>
10-14-24-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/13/2024 8:59:49 AM
Creation date
11/13/2024 8:54:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
106
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — SEPTEMBER 9, 2024 9 <br />Councilmember Holden asked for confirmation that the current union contract will expire in <br />January. <br />Public Works Director and City Engineer Swearingen confirmed. He said negotiations have <br />begun. <br />Councilmember Monson noted the City hasn't done an analysis like this in several years. She <br />believes the impact on the levy may be too big. She would like to understand what the levy impact <br />would be if we come to market and move to above market over the next three years. She <br />recognizes we are digging ourselves out of a hole and trying to be above average for a pay <br />philosophy. She thinks the cost is too high to take on at one time. She would like to see what the <br />cost of being at market and the costs of exceeding the market at 5% vs. 8% as outlined in the <br />current option. She wants to understand what the scale of a change like that would be. Would it <br />mean $20,000 or $100,000 difference? <br />Tessia Melvin said she doesn't want to guess what that number might be. She said the most <br />important question that should be answered tonight is the implementation of this. Will employees <br />be placed at the closest step, by dollar amount, to what they are currently making or will they <br />remain at the same step and receive that increase. She anticipates going from 8% to market, the <br />cost will go down by a couple percent. <br />Tessia Melvin said Council is saying they want to fix the grid immediately for hiring and <br />retention. The implementation can be slowed down. She noted there are other ways to slow it <br />down. Council could choose to do the COLA and everyone stays where they are. The rest could be <br />implemented in July. She said she can keep giving different options but that is going to cause <br />confusion. Her recommendation is to stay the course with the grid because people have seen it. If <br />the grid starts changing, then people stop trusting the process. There are different ways to <br />implement the changes to get to a more comfortable cost. If Council is saying that $124,000 is <br />okay but $155,000 is too much, the implementation can be pushed to April or July or October. <br />She can work with Finance Director Yang to come up with a scenario that keeps the budget <br />impact at a certain dollar amount or percentage of levy impact. She has seen instances where <br />initial discussions said one thing and Council lowered it. Employee morale goes down in those <br />situations. The trust in the process can be lost. <br />Councilmember Monson asked if changing from 8% above market to being at market, would <br />change how the grid moves. <br />Tessia Melvin confirmed. She said the grid is calibrated for 8%. <br />Councilmember Holden said they did this three years ago and she said we are very close with <br />only four positions below market. <br />Tessia Melvin said the pay equity is done every three years. This is market analysis. <br />Councilmember Holden understands but stated that is how we have adjusted the grid and COLA <br />in the past. Sometimes it was 5% sometimes it was 3%. She thinks this option is too much money. <br />She thinks if implementation is delayed until July, all we're doing is moving a bunch of money <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.