My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-14-24-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2024
>
10-14-24-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/13/2024 8:59:49 AM
Creation date
11/13/2024 8:54:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
106
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — SEPTEMBER 9, 2024 7 <br />stated if the rezoning were to go through, the property could then be sold to the highest bidder and <br />the City would not know what type of development could come forward. <br />Councilmember Monson explained she read the notes from the Planning Commission and there <br />was some discussion surrounding the comprehensive plan amendment that would allow for <br />double the number of units on the site. <br />Senior Planner Fransen stated as part of the applicant's earlier application for the <br />comprehensive plan amendments, there was another section that was modified as part of the <br />amendments. She reviewed the sections that were amended regarding land use and net residential <br />density. She explained that in this particular region of the city, residential density may be <br />increased up to 100% through the PUD process if the intent was to meet the goals of the <br />comprehensive plan. She commented the R-4 zoning district would allow for up to 12 units per <br />acre as established in the zoning ordinance. <br />Councilmember Monson asked if a PUD were brought forward would the City have to allow up <br />to 100% more density. <br />Senior Planner Fransen indicated based on the language within the comprehensive plan, there is <br />a "may" statement and not a "shall", meaning the City Council could consider higher density but <br />was not required to approve a higher density. <br />Councilmember Monson reported if the City were to rezone to R-3, the 100% would be a lower <br />density. <br />Senior Planner Fransen stated this property was guided for high density and the R-3 zoning <br />district would have different residential intent. <br />Councilmember Monson indicated if this property were rezoned to R-4 and the density could <br />then be doubled, the City would be welcoming a higher density in this place. She stated if the <br />property were zoned R-3, the City could then welcome a lower density project. <br />Interim City Administrator Jagoe reported the R-3 zoning district would allow for up to eight <br />units per acre. She explained the rezoning to R-4 would allow the zoning code to be consistent <br />with guiding in the comprehensive plan. <br />Councilmember Rousseau stated generally, the City could do 12 units per acre for the 10.74 <br />acres but this could double because it was allowed within the comprehensive plan. <br />Senior Planner Fransen agreed this was the case, noting the comprehensive plan would allow <br />for up to a 100% increase through a PUD in the R-4 zoning district. She then reviewed the <br />location for the potential increase in the comprehensive plan. <br />Councilmember Monson stated she wanted to hear more about the history of this comprehensive <br />plan amendment from Mayor Grant or Councilmember Holden. <br />Councilmember Holden recommended staff speak to this further. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.