My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-14-24-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2024
>
10-14-24-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/13/2024 8:59:49 AM
Creation date
11/13/2024 8:54:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
106
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — SEPTEMBER 9, 2024 8 <br />Interim City Administrator Jagoe stated when the comprehensive plan was adopted in 2018 <br />this language did not exist. She explained in 2019, Trident Development came in and developed <br />the Round Lake Senior building and at that time the comprehensive plan was amended to provide <br />the boundaries for the area where up to a 100% increase in density would be permitted through <br />the PUD process, which was split by Highway 10. She indicated this language was then amended <br />in 2022 to cross over and incorporate the North Heights site. <br />Mayor Grant asked if it would be fair to say the City scored points with the Met Council based <br />on the density encouraged language that was included within the comprehensive plan. <br />Interim City Administrator Jagoe reported this was the case. <br />Councilmember Holden reiterated that the City Council was to be provided plans back in 2022 <br />for this project and this did not happen. Had she known that, she may not have approved the <br />change to the comprehensive plan. <br />Mayor Grant requested to review an aerial of the property. He noted this property was bounded <br />by Highway 10, County Road 96 and North Heights Church. He indicated he would never support <br />more than the initial 124 units for this property due to the dimensions of the site. <br />Mayor Grant opened the public hearing at 8:03 p.m. <br />Roger Fink, representative for Trident Development, thanked the Council for their concerns and <br />questions. He explained there are many steps and approvals necessary for this development. He <br />indicated he has been working closely with City staff on which path would be best to follow in <br />order to receive these approvals. He recognized the development site was somewhat complicated <br />and he felt the best approach was to get the comp plan amendment approved, followed by a <br />rezoning and subdivision. He stated this puts the church in a position where they have created a <br />separate parcel that could be sold to Trident Development or someone else. He explained it was <br />his goal to get to a final plat and building permit so he can complete the transaction from the <br />church in order to purchase the parcel from the church. He indicated there has been a lot of <br />discussion about the density bonus included in the comp plan. He stated he did not have a good <br />memory to recall how this language came about, but noted this site has numerous physical <br />constraints that would make it difficult to increase the density. He reported if he did not go <br />through with the transaction with the church and someone else wanted to purchase the parcel, <br />they would be meeting the same physical constraints. He discussed how the preliminary plat <br />would not be created in a vacuum, but rather would take into account the wetland boundaries, the <br />building footprint, stormwater ponding and surface parking. He stated when the site plan is <br />brought forward, he would show the Council how all of the pieces fit together within the confines <br />of the lot. He explained he had a hard time understanding where the parking would fit if a <br />development were to come forward with 240 units. <br />Mayor Grant asked if the applicant would be bringing forward a project that was a PUD. <br />Mr. Fink indicated he was still in discussions with staff regarding this matter. He explained he <br />was still trying to understand if flexibility would be required for two minor areas within the <br />proj ect. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.