My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-14-24-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2024
>
10-14-24-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/13/2024 8:59:49 AM
Creation date
11/13/2024 8:54:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
106
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — SEPTEMBER 23, 2024 6 <br />Finance Director Yang explained the general fund balance was currently at $3 million on an <br />annual basis. <br />Councilmember Fabel discussed how an 11.87% tax levy includes more deficit spending in <br />2025. <br />Finance Director Yang indicated the proposed budget projects a budget deficit in 2025. <br />Councilmember Fabel questioned if the Finance Director recommended the City continue with <br />deficit spending into the new year. <br />Finance Director Yang stated ideally, the City would want to adopt a balanced budget, but she <br />has seen the Council has adopted a budget deficit in the past, noting some of the budgets have <br />outperformed the projected deficit. She indicated there was some risk in adopting a budget that <br />was not balanced. <br />Councilmember Fabel commented in order to approve a balanced budget cuts would have to <br />occur or the tax levy would have to be increased to 15.5%. <br />Councilmember Holden stated the City only receives property taxes twice a year, so the <br />numbers from July 26, 2024 were deceiving. <br />Finance Director Yang reported this was correct. <br />Mayor Grant commented on the July 26 year to date versus actual numbers. He discussed the <br />amount of funding that was transferred out in 2020, noting these additional funds were due to <br />CARES dollars. He indicated the City maintains a 50% fund balance. He reviewed the transfers <br />that were made in 2021 and 2022, noting the Council has tried to budget well, while funding extra <br />projects that may not have been included in the budget. He did not believe it was realistic to <br />believe staff would spend 100% of every single cost within the budget. He indicated Arden Hills <br />was not unique when realizing it will not spend 100% of every dollar within the budget. He <br />explained the budget was a plan and not a determination that every dime within the budget would <br />be spent. <br />Councilmember Monson indicated in 2022 there were concerns with the fact the Council was <br />relying on revenues to balance costs knowing the City was going into a high inflationary period. <br />She explained there was some under spending but there was also more revenue that came in that <br />was not anticipated. She commented this year and last year, staff made it clear no additional <br />revenue was anticipated other than what was budgeted. In fact, the revenues projected for 2024 <br />may not come in as planned. She stated last year she supported under funding the levy. She <br />explained she was hesitant to approve another budget with deficit spending given the fact there <br />were no large developments on the horizon for 2025. She commented on the great investments the <br />City would be making in its staff in the coming year, noting this investment would assist with <br />retention and recruitment. She also reported one of the main comments she hears from residents <br />was that they want the trails and parks maintained, which led her to believe the City should be <br />investing in its parks for the betterment of the community. <br />Councilmember Rousseau explained the majority of the Council supported franchise fees to <br />assist with the construction expenses for the fire department. She discussed how the Council <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.