Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — SEPTEMBER 23, 2024 7 <br />would be setting the maximum for the levy and the amount could then be reduced in the coming <br />weeks and months before the final levy is set in December. She commented on how a median <br />value home valued $469,000 would be impacted by an 11.87% levy increase noting this would be <br />a $13.83 per month increase and with a 15.5% levy increase the monthly increase would be <br />$17.58. She stated this was a four dollar per month increase. She believed it would be more <br />responsible for the Council to start out with the higher value (15.5%) for the preliminary tax levy. <br />MOTION: Councilmember Monson moved and Councilmember Rousseau seconded a <br />motion directing staff to implement the compensation study as discussed in <br />the amount of $155,000 on January 1, 2025. <br />Councilmember Holden stated this item was out of order. She noted the item on the agenda was <br />to consider the preliminary tax levy and truth in taxation hearing. <br />Mayor Grant clarified by asking Finance Director Yang if the compensation study would be <br />implemented in the 2025 budget and she reported that the $155,000 had been included. He <br />indicated the task before the Council was to set a preliminary levy, along with a truth in taxation <br />hearing date. <br />Councilmember Monson stated she was clear as to the matter before the Council, but she wanted <br />to ensure the compensation study results were implemented in the 2025 budget. <br />Councilmember Holden indicated $155,000 would cover salary but would not cover benefits, <br />FICA or unemployment, which meant the amount the City would be spending would be higher <br />than $155,000. She explained she originally did not support the $155,000 in additional salary, but <br />was willing to offer her support. She did not believe any person on the Council was wanting to <br />take this item out of the 2025 budget. She commented there were items that she believed were <br />wants instead of needs that she would consider reducing or removing from the budget. <br />Mayor Grant commented he believed the budget was clear and the Council has not made a <br />statement that would indicate this funding would be removed from the 2025 budget. <br />Councilmember Monson explained she would not be withdrawing her motion. <br />Mayor Grant asked if it was in keeping with approving the preliminary levy to consider the <br />budget line item by line item. He asked the City Attorney for an opinion. <br />City Attorney Bjorkness advised the broad scope of what was listed on the agenda does <br />contemplate a motion such as the motion made by Councilmember Monson and the action was <br />appropriate. <br />The motion carried (5-0). <br />MOTION: Councilmember Monson moved and Councilmember Rousseau seconded a <br />motion to approve the Public Works request for the Park Manager position <br />(effective 4/1/25) as well as the Public Works Lead position (effective 1/1/25). <br />Mayor Grant asked if the finance staff had created a budget with these positions included. <br />