My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-28-24-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2024
>
10-28-24-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/13/2024 9:18:36 AM
Creation date
11/13/2024 9:02:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
282
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — OCTOBER 14, 2024 12 <br />Interim City Administrator Jagoe said we can't prohibit but will have to verify with the City <br />Attorney if we can cap the registrations. Staff was looking at it as do we want to limit the zoning <br />districts. The secondary piece is the registration ordinance. She will get verification from the City <br />Attorney before this comes back to council. <br />Councilmember Holden asked for clarification on what Councilmember Rousseau is talking <br />about. She asked if she talking about a business that tests cannabis potency that would then be <br />sold at a retail location. <br />Councilmember Rousseau was thinking along the lines where there are food scientists that are <br />testing the potency. <br />Councilmember Holden asked if that is different than a retail location. <br />Interim City Administrator Jagoe said cannabis testing facilities falls under the research and <br />development. <br />Councilmember Holden thinks testing a gummy bear for potency is different than R & D for <br />medical purposes. <br />Interim City Administrator Jagoe will clarify with the City Attorney. <br />Councilmember Monson summarized we have agreed to one retailer. Staff will find out if the <br />City can cap the other uses. It can not be prohibited. She thinks Council should look down the list <br />and discuss each use and discuss where it may be allowed. <br />Mayor Grant asked if council wants to be more conservative or liberal. <br />Councilmember Fabel said he wants to be more conservative. He would like to keep this out of <br />the public eye with no flashing signs and people smoking up and acting crazy on County Road E. <br />Councilmember Holden said we really only have one retail area. That's Lexington Avenue and <br />County Road E. If we don't put it in a retail area, where will it go? Flashing lights are not allowed. <br />Councilmember Fabel asked if there is a flex zone for retail. <br />Interim City Administrator Jagoe said it is written into the commercial districts. <br />Mayor Grant said he is hearing Council would like to be conservative, in terms of what is <br />allowed for retail. He stated along Lexington there is B-3 right up against Lexington and B-4 is <br />behind that. If we want to be conservative, we can allow it in the B-4 district. <br />Councilmember Rousseau said Cub is in the B-3 and they are already carrying the low potency <br />THC. That would give a little more opportunity for something small to go in that area. She is open <br />to the B-4, as well. <br />Councilmember Holden doesn't want it under neighborhood business. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.