My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-28-24-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2024
>
10-28-24-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/13/2024 9:18:36 AM
Creation date
11/13/2024 9:02:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
282
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — OCTOBER 14, 2024 13 <br />Interim City Administrator Jagoe said the way it's drafted right now, cannabis sales would not <br />be allowed under neighborhood business. <br />Councilmember Holden said that low potency edibles are allowed in neighborhood business. <br />Interim City Administrator Jagoe confirmed. She said the way that was written is it's tied to <br />someone who had a liquor or tobacco license. There was not zoning restrictions for the low <br />potency. We said it was allowed as an accessory use in any commercial district, if they had the <br />liquor or tobacco license. It couldn't be the principal use. For the cannabis discussion, that could <br />be the principal use and the only thing they sell so it is not proposed to be allowed at all in the <br />neighborhood business district. <br />Councilmember Monson said it should not be allowed in B-1. She would support B-4. She's <br />okay with Lexington or County Road E, however, she does not think a Mezzo -business or a <br />Micro -business is appropriate because of the scale they could be. As she understands it, those <br />businesses grow their own, package their own and sell their own products. She wouldn't want that <br />allowed in a retail area. But she would be open to allowing that in the gateway business area. <br />Mayor Grant thinks B-4 is where you allow it. All of them. <br />Interim City Administrator Jagoe said that's the retail component of micro business, cannabis <br />sales, the mezzo business. The other uses including manufacturing, agricultural, indoor <br />cultivation, R & D will be left as conditional uses in the industrial areas. <br />Councilmember Monson asked if Council could walk down the list one by one. She asked if <br />Council agrees that B-4 is the district. <br />Mayor Grant said B-4 would make sense for all cannabis business types. It would not be his <br />preference that a 50,000 square foot empty building on Lexington have a growing facility. <br />Councilmember Rousseau said she would love for anything to go into that space. <br />Mayor Grant agreed he would love that space to be filled but not with this. <br />Councilmember Holden thinks B-4 is a quiet area. There are a lot of small businesses back there. <br />There are a lot of unknowns including hours of operation. She assumes a lot of the customers will <br />come in at 2:00 in the morning. This isn't regulated, like alcohol. She thinks it will be important <br />to have police coverage. On Lexington it's a lot more visible and the hours could be limited, <br />based on location of the site. <br />Interim City Administrator Jagoe said that is one of the questions Staff has. Would the Council <br />want there to be standards to include limiting hours of operation. That can be incorporated it the <br />ordinance language. Council can outline that if an individual applies for the registration, the <br />business can only operate during certain hours. <br />Mayor Grant thinks Council probably does want to restrict it. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.