My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-28-24-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2024
>
10-28-24-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/13/2024 2:57:40 PM
Creation date
11/13/2024 2:57:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—OCTOBER 28, 2024 9 <br /> Department station. Ehler's provided preliminary debt service schedules, to align with the <br /> construction of the new facility, with debt service payments expected to occur in February 2026. <br /> Staff recommends adoption of the franchise fee options no later than November 2024, to allow <br /> Xcel to meet the Public Utilities Commission's requirements. <br /> Finance Director Yang commented despite one ordinance being for electrical service and the <br /> other for natural gas service, the provisions of the two ordinances are nearly identical, with the <br /> exception of that the proposed new franchise fee rates are included in the electric franchise <br /> agreement ordinance under Section 9. Both ordinances are proposed to have twenty-year terms <br /> which is the same term as the existing agreements. The City's existing gas ordinance is set to <br /> expire in 2029 and is being brought forward for renewal to align with the two electric franchise <br /> agreements. There are no changes to the gas ordinance as the City will not be imposing a <br /> franchise fee on gas utilities. <br /> Finance Director Yang reported the City will need to adopt a new and separate ordinance for <br /> implementing an electric franchise fee. The City has not imposed a franchise fee on gas or electric <br /> services in the past. The franchise fee structure will be a monthly flat fee on each premise. The fee <br /> structure can be amended anytime throughout the twenty-year agreement. These <br /> ordinances/agreements have been reviewed by the City Attorney and will need to be fully <br /> approved and executed prior to Xcel Energy's implementation of franchise fees on customers' <br /> bills. Staff reviewed a potential timeline for the franchise fee ordinance and recommended <br /> approval. <br /> Councilmember Fabel noted the proposed ordinance establishes the residential rate at $3.25 and <br /> staff presented a franchise fee of$3.00. <br /> Mayor Grant commented the final document will reflect the rate the Council approves. <br /> Councilmember Rousseau explained her interest in the proposed franchise fee was to distribute <br /> the public safety expense amongst all residents and businesses in the community. She reported <br /> she was interested in the franchise fee within Schedule A because it would have commercial <br /> properties paying an additional $10 or $20 per month versus residents. <br /> Councilmember Holden asked how many people completed the survey. <br /> Finance Director Yang reported 73 residents responded to the survey. <br /> Councilmember Holden commented one of the speakers asked that the City delay building the <br /> fire station. She explained the City has a contractual Joint Powers Agreement between Arden <br /> Hills, Shoreview and North Oaks, requires the fire station to be built in 2025. She asked how <br /> many non-profits were located in Arden Hills. <br /> Mayor Grant estimated there were close to 80 non-profits in Arden Hills. <br /> Councilmember Monson stated she supports the franchise fees. She understood it was an <br /> imperfect process, but the franchise fees would provide the right outcome. She indicated the City <br /> has held public hearings and has written about the franchise fee within the Arden Hills Notes. She <br /> indicated the City was not trying to hide the fees from the public, but rather was trying to mitigate <br /> the concerns. She reported if the City were to levy for this, the City would have an additional 8% <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.