My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-15-24 -SWS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2024
>
10-15-24 -SWS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/13/2024 3:14:28 PM
Creation date
11/13/2024 3:08:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL WORK SESSION—OCTOBER 15, 2024 6 <br /> Councilmember Fabel said beginning negotiations and bringing the information back would <br /> give Council something concrete to deal with at the work sessions. <br /> Councilmember Rousseau prefers for Council to get together to discuss where the focus should <br /> be. She is fine with the JDA representatives bringing those discussion points to the developer and <br /> the county. It has been hard to get everyone together for meetings in the past. If coordinating a <br /> work session proves to be difficult, it might change her view. She would like to shoot for the third <br /> Monday of the month and establish a schedule, that would be great. <br /> Councilmember Holden asked how long it took to arrange the meeting tonight. It didn't take a <br /> year. <br /> Interim City Administrator Jagoe thought it was September. <br /> Councilmember Rousseau said there is an issue with the code of conduct for committees that <br /> was identified in January and the discussion still has not happened. In April or May the City <br /> Administrator requested one, as well. There is a pattern. <br /> Councilmember Holden said Council had the opportunity to move that item to a work session <br /> and no one did. <br /> Mayor Grant said Council needs to focus on getting it done, not on what has happened in the <br /> past. <br /> Councilmember Monson said for scheduling work sessions, she's looking at the list, it can <br /> probably be split in half and schedule two work sessions in October and early November. If the <br /> desire is to do a work session prior to negotiations, she would want a weekly cadence starting <br /> next week. The developer is keen on having discussions on the Term Sheet. <br /> Mayor Grant thinks it needs to be faster than that. He thinks it should be no more than two work <br /> sessions and the procedure for the negotiations needs to be decided. <br /> Councilmember Fabel thinks the first meeting with Bob Lux won't necessarily be a give and <br /> take, it will be more of a touch base to determine where we start from. He thinks there should be a <br /> meeting with the developer to determine where we are. <br /> Mayor Grant reminded the Term Sheet is only an agreement between the City and Bob Lux. The <br /> County is not included but the County has requested that we take this step so the process can <br /> move forward. <br /> Councilmember Holden said Council needs to know what the priorities are going to be. Is it the <br /> civic site or the pocket parks or something else? The negotiators need to know what the City's <br /> priorities are. They aren't all equal in her mind. <br /> Discussion ensued regarding how many work session meetings are needed and how often. <br /> Stacie Kvilvang said nothing has changed. The developer and the County want to know if this <br /> Council still wants the things that are on the current Term Sheet. The big discussion is going to be <br /> TIF because that changes with the financials. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.