Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> . <br /> . <br /> . The Mayor announced that the meeting was open for the <br /> consideration of objections to proposed supplemental assessments <br /> and reassessments of previous assessments in respect to <br /> Consolidated Water Improvements Nos. 68-6 and 68-3, said <br /> original hearing being held September 28, 1970, and said <br /> assessment roll being adopted September 28, 1970, and certified <br /> to the County Auditor on October 28, 1970. All persons present <br /> were then given an opportunity to present oral objections, and <br /> all written objections theretofore filed with the Village Clerk <br /> Administrator were presented and considered, and all such <br /> objections were tabulated as follows: <br /> MR. WILIJiRD. J . NEAMY, 3171 Lexington Avenue: Felt that he <br /> should have been assessed for only 80 feet, as was done on the <br /> sewer assessment, rather than 160 feet. He also asked, if he is <br /> assessed for 160 feet, if part of it could be deferred since he's <br /> living on a pension and doesn't have the money to pay the assessment. <br /> MR. BERNHARD W. LE VANDER, 3550 Siems Court: Has been assessed <br /> for three connections and asked that this be reduced to two. He owns <br /> three lots. His house is located in the center and, in expanding <br /> his home a few years ago, the house is now so close to one of the <br /> side lots that it is an unbuildable lot. <br /> MR. S.. G. CORTELYOU, 1548 W=st Arden place: HaS a badly skewed <br /> lot and felt that the front footage figure used in determining his <br /> assessment was too high. <br /> MR. GEORGE URAM, 1770 Gramsie: Lives on the corner of Gramsie <br /> ~ and Dellview. He was assessed 125 feet on Dellview and 15 on Gramsie. <br /> t Thought he Should be assessed only for the 90 feet he owns on Gramsie <br /> plus 15 feet on Dellview. <br /> MR. JAMES SHERMAN, 3946 Dellview: OWns an odd shaped lot with <br /> 72 feet on the street and has been assessed for 120 feet. Believes <br /> the assessment is excessive and asked for an explanation of the basis <br /> of 120 feet front footage. <br /> Mr. Albert M. Olen, 3270 North Hamline: Asked if he had been <br /> assessed or should be assessed on Hamline Avenue. was informed that <br /> his .front footage assessment would be reduced. <br />