CC 11-09-1970 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. . . DR. ROBERT DUNN, 3413 North Snelling: Asked why he had been assessed for both frontage and acreage. MRS. ED CALPH, 1651 west County Road F: Complained about some of the construction work not being finished. MR. BERNHARD W. LE VANDER, Attorney-at-LaW, representing Mounds View School District No. 621: Said that school property should be treated as residential property and should be assessed at $5 a front foot rather than the proposed $7.50 a front foot which is the commercial property assessment. MRS. TRUDY HARMON, 1661 west County Road F: Comments about the unfinished construction work on county Road F. MR. JAMES SHERMAN, 3946 Dellview: After the Council reviews his assessment, asked if they would advise what they used as a set back line. In comparing his lot size and assessment with another lot in the Village, asked if the Council would also advise what has been used as the set back line on the other lot. Communications were received from the following: MR. R. C. THRASHER, 3200 Lake Lane: He has 48 feet on Shore- line Lane and 35 feet on Lake Lane for a total of 83 feet for which he was assessed. He objected because he said he had been told he would be assessed as a corner lot with a 15 foot assessment on the side. MR. VERNON SMITH, 1175 Edgewater: owns three 50-foot lots. He was charged for 150 feet frontage plus 15 feet on the side for a corner lot. He said the lots drop off sharply toward the lake and he feels the assessment is too high for this particular piece of property. MR. ARNIE HOVIN, 3470 Siems Court: Mr. Hovin submitted a plat that shows a frontage of 120 feet with a rear width of 57 feet and the lot is skewed. He was assessed for 100 feet which is the same as the sanitary sewer assessment. He claims the average is 88 1/2 feet and he feels he is entitled to an adjustment to 88 1/2 feet. . MR. WILLIAM BACHMAN, 3187 Lexington Avenue: HaS 80 feet on Lexington but his lot extends to Lake Josephine. He felt that he . should be assessed for only 80 feet rather than 160 feet. MR. LAWRENCE KINPORTS, 1645 Valentine: Objected to his assess- ment and asked that it be adjusted. The engineer indicated that the frontage used for this assessment is different from that used for the sanitary sewer assessment. The sanitary sewer wasn't constructed on old Snelling Avenue but on the back of his lot between his lot and the neighbor immediately to the west. The water main goes not only on old Snelling Avenue but on valentine Avenue so he was assessed the width of his lot on Snelling which is 200 feet plus 15 feet on