My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-09-24-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2024
>
12-09-24-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/17/2024 2:31:34 PM
Creation date
12/17/2024 2:11:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
369
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — NOVEMBER 12, 2024 2 <br />The City held a Special Work Session on November 71h to review and discuss the 2022 Term <br />Sheet, the Parks MOU as well as the Option Agreement for the Civic site. The City Council <br />discussed some of the previously considered uses for the Civic Site and there was a general <br />consensus on continuing to negotiate the purchase the 1.6 acre site as previously agreed upon in <br />the MOU with the Developer. Another work session was scheduled for Monday, November 181h <br />at 5:30 to review the Parks MOU and park amenity needs and trail connectivity within Rice Creek <br />Commons. Staff will be working with Alatus and our consultant to bring back visuals and <br />additional information relevant to the parks. <br />Councilmember Holden requested the JDA review the new study from Vancouver where an all - <br />electric area had to be dumped. She questioned if gas pipes would be installed within this all - <br />electric development, in the event a waiver was needed. <br />Interim City Administrator Jagoe reported some of these discussions will still need to be had <br />by the Energy Advisory Committee. <br />Councilmember Holden asked if the utility details will be worked out prior to the grading work <br />beginning. She commented she did not want to turn down good anchor businesses because the <br />utility details were not worked out. <br />Interim City Administrator Jagoe stated she could not speak to when the utilities would be <br />installed, but it was her understanding the right of way would be sufficient to accommodate for <br />either option. <br />Councilmember Holden explained she wanted the public to know the City would be moving <br />forward with the purchase of the civic site for $1. <br />Mayor Grant questioned why the Vancouver all -electric community was dumped. <br />Councilmember Holden stated the project was dumped because it didn't work. She indicated she <br />would send this study to Interim City Administrator Jagoe. <br />Interim City Administrator Jagoe indicated she could forward this study to the City Council <br />and JDA. <br />Councilmember Monson commented the JDA discussed how to balance the ambitious goals of <br />having an all -electric community in Minnesota, while also balancing the types of users that come <br />into the community to ensure walkability and sustainability within itself. She indicated this has <br />always been her view given the carbon reduction goals for the site. She described how the waiver <br />process would be followed for users that would need an offset for their carbon footprint. She <br />understood the JDA's goals were ambitious, but she did not want to give up before the project <br />even began. <br />Councilmember Fabel discussed how the language for Rice Creek Commons was changed from <br />it "will" be an all -electric community to Rice Creek Commons seeks to be an all -electric <br />community. He stated there was an aspirational desire to be an all -electric community while also <br />recognizing there may be exceptions to this. <br />3. PUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONAL <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.