Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — NOVEMBER 25, 2024 8 <br />establish performance standards for cannabis uses, in anticipation of the Office of Cannabis <br />Management (OCM) issuing licenses for cannabis businesses in 2025. <br />Consultant Planner Hofer reported the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the <br />ordinance amendment. No comments were received. The Commission voted 6-0 to recommend <br />approval, with six amendments, of Planning Case 24-016. The amendments have been described <br />previously in this report. The Planning Commission reviewed this application at their November <br />6, 2024, meeting. The following findings of fact are offered for Council's consideration: <br />1. The City of Arden Hills is proposing to amend ordinance to establish definitions for <br />cannabis uses, determine zoning districts for cannabis uses, and establish performance <br />standards for cannabis uses. <br />2. The proposed ordinance will include amendments to the language of Chapter 13 — Zoning <br />Code of the City Code. <br />3. Amendments to the Zoning Code regulations require a public hearing prior to action by <br />the City Council. <br />4. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on November 6, 2024. <br />Councilmember Rousseau commented she originally was interested in locating retail cannabis in <br />the B-3 zoning district. She explained she wanted to see this use destigmatized and supported <br />retail sales in both the B-3 and B-4 zoning districts. She stated she would be in favor of free <br />market, but because there was so much change happening so quickly, she recommended the City <br />limit the number of cannabis retailers to one. <br />Mayor Grant indicated he supported retail cannabis sales only in the B-4 zoning district and <br />supported the City only having one cannabis retailer. He stated he was concerned about odor and <br />commented on how this may impact the B-3 business district. He reported he was a little <br />concerned with the fact the OCM was still establishing the rules. He explained he was uncertain <br />why the Planning Commission included microbusiness and mezzobusinesses. He stated he wanted <br />to see the City Council proceeding cautiously allowing for one retailer. <br />Councilmember Holden explained the Council discussed this matter extensively and noted she <br />could support excluding retail sales in the Gateway Business and B-3 zoning districts. <br />Councilmember Fabel questioned if the odor from cannabis was just from smoking or was there <br />an odor from manufacturing as well. <br />Mayor Grant stated it was his understanding the odor from manufacturing or growers comes <br />from the flower of the cannabis plant and the odor was very poignant in the late summer early fall <br />months. He reported the smell was likened to a skunk. <br />Councilmember Fabel indicated he would like to keep retail sales off of County Road E and <br />Lexington Avenue, which means he would only support retail sales in the B-4 zoning district. <br />Mayor Grant asked if cannabis sales made sense in the Gateway Business District. <br />Councilmember Holden stated she was uncertain how to go ahead with amending the proposed <br />Ordinance. <br />