My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-16-24-SR
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2024
>
12-16-24-SR
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/17/2024 2:38:45 PM
Creation date
12/17/2024 2:33:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — NOVEMBER 25, 2024 9 <br />Mayor Grant recommended staff rewrite the code in such a manner to meet the desired <br />requirements. <br />Councilmember Fabel commented on the hours of operation requirements. He stated he would <br />like to see the City ordinance reflecting the minimum hours of operation required by State law. <br />Consultant Planner Hofer reported the most restrictive hours that could be approved within the <br />ordinance would be 10:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. Monday through Sunday. <br />Councilmember Holden asked if the mezzobusiness and microbusinesses could be removed <br />from the ordinance. <br />Consultant Planner Hofer discouraged the Council from proceeding in this manner. He <br />explained mezzobusinesses and microbusinesses are a specific license type the City may want to <br />regulate. He reported the Council could opt to limit mezzobusiness and microbusinesses within <br />the Gateway Business District. <br />Councilmember Holden supported removing microbusiness and mezzobusinesses from the <br />ordinance altogether. In addition, she recommended cannabis sales not be allowed in the Gateway <br />Business district or the B-3 business district. <br />Councilmember Fabel stated he thought he heard Consultant Planner Hofer recommend against <br />the elimination of the microbusiness and mezzobusiness language from the ordinance. <br />Consultant Planner Hofer directed this question to the City Attorney. <br />City Attorney Bjerkness stated if the question was could the microbusiness and mezzobusiness <br />language be removed, she believed the answer was no. She detailed how the language could <br />remain for the B-4 zoning district but that the language could be removed for the Gateway <br />Business and B-3 zoning districts. <br />Councilmember Fabel commented given the concerns regarding odor, perhaps cannabis retail, <br />microbusiness and mezzobusinesses should be limited to the B-4 zoning district. <br />Mayor Grant supported the City putting proper regulations in place with the understanding the <br />Council could always revisit the matter at a future date. <br />Councilmember Holden believed it made more sense to allow retail sales in the B-4 zoning <br />district versus the Gateway Business District because this area was full of giant industrial <br />buildings. <br />City Attorney Bjerkness stated after researching the matter further, she indicated the City cannot <br />prohibit businesses with a microbusiness and mezzobusiness license. <br />MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Mavor Grant seconded a motion to adobt <br />Ordinance 2024-015 for Planning Case 24-019 regarding a Zoning Code <br />Amendment to Chapter 13, Section 1305 to establish definitions for cannabis <br />uses, 1320 to determine zoning districts for cannabis uses, and 1325 to <br />establish performance standards for cannabis uses. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.