My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-16-24-SR
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2024
>
12-16-24-SR
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/17/2024 2:38:45 PM
Creation date
12/17/2024 2:33:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — NOVEMBER 25, 2024 2 <br />Councilmember Rousseau noted the penalty for violation for tobacco sales was outlined and she <br />wondered what the penalty was for serving alcohol to a minor. <br />Assistant to the City Administrator/City Clerk Hanson pointed to the section of the Fee <br />Schedule that outlines penalties. It depends on if a person has had server training, or not. They are <br />set depending on the number of violations. <br />Councilmember Rousseau is surprised that the violation for minor consumption of alcohol is <br />smaller than the charge for a tobacco sale violation. <br />Assistant to the City Administrator/City Clerk Hanson said Council can revisit those topics. <br />She doesn't know what the statutory minimums are and would have to do some research. <br />Councilmember Rousseau would be interested in looking at increasing that penalty amount for <br />alcohol. <br />Councilmember Holden said there have not been many violations but with the event center <br />coming, it might be a good time to revisit that topic. <br />Assistant to the City Administrator/City Clerk Hanson said she can remember only two <br />violations in the nine years she has been with the City. She asked for direction on what to <br />research. <br />Councilmember Rousseau said she would just prefer to move the penalty amount up to equal <br />what a tobacco violation would be. <br />Mayor Grant would be fine with that. He thinks the penalty for cannabis should be stiffer, too. A <br />lot of places scan drivers licenses now. But in a restaurant setting when a server is serving <br />multiple tables, it can become more of an issue. <br />Assistant to the City Administrator/City Clerk Hanson asked if Council wants her to just raise <br />the amounts as allowed by statute to mirror the tobacco violation penalty. She pointed to the <br />pages in the Fee Schedule that outline the violation amounts. <br />Councilmember Rousseau would like to keep the amount "with the training" similar to where it <br />is. <br />Mayor Grant outlined that if they do the training, they get off easier. But if they don't do the <br />training it will be increased. <br />Councilmember Rousseau said hopefully they would want to do the training. <br />Councilmember Holden said if a server has had the training, there should be no violations. The <br />first violation, without training is $1,000. She thinks the penalty for a first violation with training <br />should be at least $500, rather than $100. <br />Discussion ensued regarding the penalty amount when a server has been trained and when they <br />haven't. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.