My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-16-24-SR
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2024
>
12-16-24-SR
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/17/2024 2:38:45 PM
Creation date
12/17/2024 2:33:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — NOVEMBER 25, 2024 3 <br />Assistant to the City Administrator/City Clerk Hanson will change the fees as discussed. <br />Councilmember Fabel said we seem to be in the minority of cities who charge a pet license fee. <br />He wonders if there were no fee, would licensure increase? He asked how licensure serve the <br />public interest. He thought more residents may license their pets if there were no fee attached to <br />it. He doesn't have a strong feeling about this topic. He wondered if we have a problem with <br />unlicensed animals. <br />Councilmember Holden said she wouldn't bother to come in and get a license. She is surprised <br />how many dangerous dogs there are. <br />Assistant to the City Administrator/City Clerk Hanson said we just got a report of a dangerous <br />dog last week and that pet was not licensed. She said that some cities have gone to a lifetime <br />license for pets. Most of them said the reason is so many pets are microchipped now. In the past, <br />licensing was the means to find an animal's owner. <br />Councilmember Holden said there are cities that say you must have a city license in order to use <br />a dog park. We don't want our dogs running around with other pets who may have been exposed <br />to something or who are unvaccinated. <br />Councilmember Rousseau said she just doesn't think people are using this. We have 28 cat <br />licenses and 96 dog licenses. There are more than 28 cats and 96 dogs in the City. She doesn't <br />know what the administrative cost is to monitor these licenses. She keeps a photo of her dog's <br />rabies vaccine on her phone. If a resident ran into the situation where they were asked to show <br />their City license, they could say their city doesn't license pets but have the necessary records <br />available if questioned. <br />Councilmember Holden asked how much we pay for the Animal Control Officer. <br />Assistant to the City Administrator/City Clerk Hanson wasn't sure. She said the license fee is <br />$30 for two years. <br />Councilmember Holden said the license fees we do receive offset the cost of the Animal Control <br />Officer. <br />Councilmember Fabel said a lifetime license makes sense to him. <br />Councilmember Rousseau still doesn't see the purpose of having this. She asked how many <br />people will want to put a collar on their indoor cat. She thinks the bigger issue is that people <br />should not be letting their cats outside. She doesn't think pet licenses are relevant anymore. <br />Finance Director Yang said the budgeted cost of the Animal Control Contract is approximately <br />$3,000 annually. The prior year spend was $2,160. <br />Mayor Grant said it must depend on the number of dogs he picks up and if they need to be held. <br />He said there are certainly more dogs in the city than there are licenses. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.