My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-16-24-SR
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2024
>
12-16-24-SR
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/17/2024 2:38:45 PM
Creation date
12/17/2024 2:33:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — NOVEMBER 25, 2024 4 <br />Councilmember Holden said there are dogs and cats running free in her neighborhood all the <br />time. <br />Mayor Grant said if someone is bit, if the owner has licensed them, then you can be certain they <br />have had their shots. <br />Councilmember Rousseau said it is unlikely we'll be bit by one of the 28 licensed cats. This <br />process is not being utilized by cat owners. <br />Councilmember Holden would support a lifetime license. <br />Assistant to the City Administrator/City Clerk Hanson said there were more cities that didn't <br />license cats. She thinks the primary users of the cat license are the Bethel students. Bethel knows <br />it's in our ordinance so they require their students to obtain a license. <br />Mayor Grant asked if Councilmember Holden is in support of lifetime licenses. <br />Councilmember Holden asked if there is a distinction between cats or dogs. <br />Councilmember Fabel said they are both in the ordinance now. He thinks dogs are the greater <br />issue, in terms of safety. <br />Mayor Grant asked what the proposed fee for a lifetime license of an animal would be. <br />Councilmember Fabel thought $50. Mayor Grant agreed. <br />Mayor Grant asked what else needs to be discussed on the Fee Schedule. <br />Assistant to the City Administrator/City Clerk Hanson said cannabis. She pointed out the <br />options. She said everyone is just starting to have this conversation so it will be interesting to see <br />where surrounding cities land. She reminded this is a cannabis registration, not a license. The <br />Office of Cannabis Management (OCM) issues the license. <br />Mayor Grant read the guideline that we could charge up to half the fee charged by OCM. He's <br />fine with that. <br />Councilmember Rousseau asked if we had to include a cannabis event. She doesn't envision <br />insurance covering an event like that. <br />Assistant to the City Administrator/City Clerk Hanson said that was in the discussion with the <br />City Attorney. We do have to allow those types of events. Council has some leeway. She said we <br />can't exclude them but can add reasonable conditions to them. Council can reduce the number of <br />days for an event and/or restrict or prohibit on -site consumption in order to protect the public <br />health and general welfare. There would be an event permit. <br />Councilmember Rousseau would be interested in requiring on -site insurance. She thinks <br />limiting it to one day and indoors, is okay for now. Later on, it can be opened up. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.