My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 05-10-2004
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
CC 05-10-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:11:23 PM
Creation date
11/9/2006 1:27:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES <br />MAY 10, 2004 <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Councilmember Rem asked if staff had assisted Ms. Murphy with 100king into financial <br />assistance. Mr. Siddiqui replied they had not yet, but they would research this if Ms. Murphy <br />requested staff s assistance. <br /> <br />Margaret Murphy, 1111 Edgewater Avenue, stated she had received the letter. She asked if <br />they had re-measured her lot, if the assessment was in line with the majority of her neighborhood, <br />and noted she did not believe her property value was increasing in line with the assessment. She <br />stated she would be looking into this further. She asked if this was her final attempt, or was there <br />something further she could do. She asked what the procedure was. Mr. Brown replied her <br />assessment was higher than the median. He stated the lot had been re-measured and her lot was <br />wider and longer than the average and that was the reason her assessment was larger. He stated <br />they had followed the guidelines and staff could not recommend a change, but the Council could <br />recommend a change. He stated she was still allowed to appeal, but he did not have the <br />information as to the process for an appeal. He noted staff had fixed guidelines that they were <br />required to follow. <br /> <br />Mayor Aplikowski asked Ms. Murphy what she felt was unique about her property. Ms. <br />Murphy stated she was on the comer of Lexington and Edgewater and because this was a noisy <br />busy street, she believed it decreased her property value. She noted homes around her were <br />selling for a 10t more. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson stated the difficulty for the Council was that this valuation could be <br />made by all of the residents, and there was no way the Council could determine the validity of <br />these arguments. <br /> <br />Ms. Murphy noted the homes on the lakeshore, even though the frontage was not as much as her <br />property, were thousands of dollars more expensive than hers and she was paying more in <br />assessments than they were. <br /> <br />Mayor Aplikowski stated she understood Ms. Murphy's argument, but noted she did have a <br />comer lot. <br /> <br />Councilmember Rem asked what was the appeal procedure and what did Ms. Murphy need to <br />do. Mayor Aplikowski replied once the Council accepted the roll, Ms. Murphy could appeal <br />and she believed this would go to Ramsey County. She requested staff to research this and get <br />back to Ms. Murphy. <br /> <br />Mr. Brown stated the City would adopt the assessment roll tonight and the process would <br />continue on. He indicated Ms. Murphy would need to hire legal counsel and her counsel would <br />sit down with the City's attorney to discuss this. He stated he was not sure ifthis was a non- <br />binding mediation, but the next step was legal counsel. He stated when an agreement was <br />reached, that amount would be entered into the assessment roll. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mayor Aplikowski replied there was a form that would need to be filIed out and her legal <br />counsel could give heI assistance in filling it out. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.