Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES <br /> NOVEMBER 29, 2004 4 <br />. Councilmember Grant stated he understood if the sidewalk goes all of the way to Snelling <br /> Avenue, it would score better. He also heard if they chose not to do a sidewalk, it would also <br /> score better. He asked which was correct. Mr. Brown stated there was an article in the <br /> newspaper that if the sidewalk to Old 10, it would score better. He indicted he had checked into <br /> this and found out this was a subjective decision and it would not be necessarily affected by any <br /> type of a rule. <br /> Councilmember Holden asked if they would also get points for an 8-foot shoulder. Mr. Brown <br /> replied she was correct and they would probably weigh on the merits if it were wise to have an <br /> alternative route for pedestrians in this corridor. <br /> Mayor Aplikowski stated she has been challenged this week to think to the future and she <br /> believed it would make sense to put sidewalks on both side of the bridge - north and south. She <br /> stated she had spoken with the City Engineer if this was feasible and he has indicated it was. She <br /> asked Council if they would be interested in considcring this option. <br /> Councilmember Rem statcd she believed the safest side to put the sidewalk in was on the north <br /> side, but she realized the north side was more cxpensive than the south side, but believed this <br /> was a better option for safety reasons. <br />. Councilmember Holden stated she was not sure they would get the pedestrian volume to put <br /> sidewalks in on both sides, even 20 years from now. <br /> Mayor Aplikowski noted this was a connection to the retail part of the City and the two different <br /> parts of the City. She stated she had heard from the residents if the path were safer, they would <br /> walk or bike to the retail section. She stated she did not know about the pedestrian volume. <br /> Ken Birk asked if anyone had every considered a pedestrian bridge instead of modifying the <br /> existing bridge. Mr. Brown replied the cost increase for a pedestrian bridge was extensive. <br /> Jean Lumberg, stated she had just heard about this sidewalk this past week. She stated from <br /> past experience, one State Department did not necessarily know what other State Departments <br /> were doing. She asked if they had explored if the State and County together were thinking about <br /> making a four-lane bridge. She noted this was an entry into the retail area and she believed a <br /> four-lane bridge might be in the future somewhere. Mr. Brown stated he had checked with both <br /> the County and MnDOT and a four-lane bridge were not being proposed in the foreseeable <br /> future. <br /> Howard Kern, 1400 West County Road E, stated he appreciated the Council's comments <br /> tonight. He believed this came down to a choice between cost and safety. If cost were the only <br /> concern, they should only put the bridge improvement in and not put in a sidewalk. However, if <br />. safety was a concern, then they should put a sidewalk on the north side because it would <br /> eliminate the mixing of pedestrian traffic and vehicle traffic. He noted they could eliminate the <br /> crosswalks entirely on the south side of the bridge so pedestrians would not cross across the <br /> bridge on the south side. He indicated all of the homes on the north side, except for two, had <br />